Tommi a13b4d1d30 Partial reland: DataChannelObserver interface change.
This is a partial reland of:
https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/299142

This CL includes the interface change in DataChannelObserver but
not the code behind it. The point of landing this change first is
to be able to override this method in downstream implementations in
preparation for relanding the rest of the changes.

Bug: webrtc:11547
Change-Id: Ic3fe4fb8084908ef12bd4916b763df5a75604113
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/300362
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Tomas Gunnarsson <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39776}
2023-04-06 08:47:53 +00:00
..
2022-10-08 08:38:36 +00:00
2023-02-24 11:48:39 +00:00
2023-04-04 08:44:23 +00:00
2022-11-29 17:04:11 +00:00
2023-03-27 17:06:33 +00:00

How to write code in the api/ directory

Mostly, just follow the regular style guide, but:

  • Note that api/ code is not exempt from the “.h and .cc files come in pairs” rule, so if you declare something in api/path/to/foo.h, it should be defined in api/path/to/foo.cc.
  • Headers in api/ should, if possible, not #include headers outside api/. Its not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small mountain of technical debt that were trying to shrink.
  • .cc files in api/, on the other hand, are free to #include headers outside api/.

That is, the preferred way for api/ code to access non-api/ code is to call it from a .cc file, so that users of our API headers wont transitively #include non-public headers.

For headers in api/ that need to refer to non-public types, forward declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The usual rules still apply, though.

.cc files in api/ should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public code, and just call it from the api/ .cc file.