Based on previous discussions I would have thought that this test would
fail, but it turns out that it passes. See referenced bug for context.
Bug: webrtc:15021
Change-Id: I845b48f688fb25942e3b770d50cafbf8a0bafe94
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/298562
Auto-Submit: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Shrubsole <eshr@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Erik Språng <sprang@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39625}
Note that api/ code is not exempt from the “.h and .cc files come in
pairs” rule, so if you declare something in api/path/to/foo.h, it should be
defined in api/path/to/foo.cc.
Headers in api/ should, if possible, not #include headers outside api/.
It’s not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small
mountain of technical debt that we’re trying to shrink.
.cc files in api/, on the other hand, are free to #include headers
outside api/.
That is, the preferred way for api/ code to access non-api/ code is to call
it from a .cc file, so that users of our API headers won’t transitively
#include non-public headers.
For headers in api/ that need to refer to non-public types, forward
declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The
usual rules still apply, though.
.cc files in api/ should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a
substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public
code, and just call it from the api/.cc file.
62dc65b537