Harald Alvestrand 794d599741 Split media_channel and its dependencies from the rtc_media_base target
This helps in figuring out which dependencies exist, and gets closer
to obeying the "one target per .cc file" rule.

Test failures seem unrelated, so using No-Try.

No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:14775
Change-Id: Id25466c8b8fe628d05c819cf7c69ae6d8421c6cf
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/288020
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#38910}
2022-12-16 12:15:22 +00:00
..
2022-10-08 08:38:36 +00:00
2022-12-15 14:32:53 +00:00
2021-08-16 14:38:57 +00:00
2022-11-29 17:04:11 +00:00
2022-03-02 22:35:46 +00:00
2021-12-14 21:16:18 +00:00
2022-10-03 14:20:17 +00:00

How to write code in the api/ directory

Mostly, just follow the regular style guide, but:

  • Note that api/ code is not exempt from the “.h and .cc files come in pairs” rule, so if you declare something in api/path/to/foo.h, it should be defined in api/path/to/foo.cc.
  • Headers in api/ should, if possible, not #include headers outside api/. Its not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small mountain of technical debt that were trying to shrink.
  • .cc files in api/, on the other hand, are free to #include headers outside api/.

That is, the preferred way for api/ code to access non-api/ code is to call it from a .cc file, so that users of our API headers wont transitively #include non-public headers.

For headers in api/ that need to refer to non-public types, forward declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The usual rules still apply, though.

.cc files in api/ should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public code, and just call it from the api/ .cc file.