Mirko Bonadei ca890ee582 Revert "Fix getStats() freeze bug affecting Chromium but not WebRTC standalone."
This reverts commit 05d43c6f7fe497fed0f2c8714e2042dd07a86df2.

Reason for revert: It breaks some Chromium trybots:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.try/linux_chromium_asan_rel_ng/206387
https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.try/linux_chromium_tsan_rel_ng/207737
https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.try/win10_chromium_x64_rel_ng/202283

Original change's description:
> Fix getStats() freeze bug affecting Chromium but not WebRTC standalone.
> 
> PeerConnection::Close() is, per-spec, a blocking operation.
> Unfortunately, PeerConnection is implemented to own resources used by
> the network thread, and Close() - on the signaling thread - destroys
> these resources. As such, tasks run in parallel like getStats() get into
> race conditions with Close() unless synchronized. The mechanism in-place
> is RTCStatsCollector::WaitForPendingRequest(), it waits until the
> network thread is done with the in-parallel stats request.
> 
> Prior to this CL, this was implemented by performing
> rtc::Thread::ProcessMessages() in a loop until the network thread had
> posted a task on the signaling thread to say that it was done which
> would then get processed by ProcessMessages(). In WebRTC this works, and
> the test is RTCStatsIntegrationTest.GetsStatsWhileClosingPeerConnection.
> 
> But because Chromium's thread wrapper does no support
> ProcessMessages(), calling getStats() followed by close() in Chrome
> resulted in waiting forever (https://crbug.com/850907).
> 
> In this CL, the process messages loop is removed. Instead, the shared
> resources are guarded by an rtc::Event. WaitForPendingRequest() still
> blocks the signaling thread, but only while shared resources are in use
> by the network thread. After this CL, calling WaitForPendingRequest() no
> longer has any unexpected side-effects since it no longer processes
> other messages that might have been posted on the thread.
> 
> The resource ownership and threading model of WebRTC deserves to be
> revisited, but this fixes a common Chromium crash without redesigning
> PeerConnection, in a way that does not cause more blocking than what
> the other PeerConnection methods are already doing.
> 
> Note: An alternative to using rtc::Event is to use resource locks and
> to not perform the stats collection on the network thread if the
> request was cancelled before the start of processing, but this has very
> little benefit in terms of performance: once the network thread starts
> collecting the stats, it would use the lock until collection is
> completed, blocking the signaling thread trying to acquire that lock
> anyway. This defeats the purpose and is a riskier change, since
> cancelling partial collection in this inherently racy edge-case would
> have observable differences from the returned stats, which may cause
> more regressions.
> 
> Bug: chromium:850907
> Change-Id: Idceeee0bddc0c9d5518b58a2b263abb2bbf47cff
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/121567
> Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26707}

TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,hbos@webrtc.org

Change-Id: Icd82cdd5bd086a90999f7fd5f8616e1f2d2153bf
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:850907
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/123225
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26721}
2019-02-15 21:10:54 +00:00
2018-10-05 14:40:21 +00:00
2019-02-06 10:24:07 +00:00
2019-02-04 19:46:30 +00:00
2019-01-29 12:16:19 +00:00
.gn
2018-08-13 13:54:05 +00:00
2019-02-15 10:00:18 +00:00
2018-12-18 12:30:58 +00:00
2018-11-09 14:23:59 +00:00
2018-07-23 15:28:48 +00:00
2018-07-23 15:28:48 +00:00
2019-01-31 22:09:16 +00:00
2018-02-23 10:34:16 +00:00

WebRTC is a free, open software project that provides browsers and mobile applications with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose.

Our mission: To enable rich, high-quality RTC applications to be developed for the browser, mobile platforms, and IoT devices, and allow them all to communicate via a common set of protocols.

The WebRTC initiative is a project supported by Google, Mozilla and Opera, amongst others.

Development

See http://www.webrtc.org/native-code/development for instructions on how to get started developing with the native code.

Authoritative list of directories that contain the native API header files.

More info

Description
The idea is to make CMake build for WebRTC m130 version - for audio processing module
Readme BSD-3-Clause 446 MiB
Languages
C++ 90.3%
Java 2.9%
C 2.2%
Objective-C++ 2%
Python 1.3%
Other 1%