Emil Lundmark 9109e856d5 Add option to log a warning for unregistered field trials
Until now you only had the option to RTC_DCHECK for unregistered field
trials. This makes it possible to log a warning instead.

Bug: webrtc:14154
Change-Id: I8628054e3c9b5d690f241a93e61299126b732ed0
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/295300
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Emil Lundmark <lndmrk@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39417}
2023-02-28 15:43:18 +00:00
..
2022-10-08 08:38:36 +00:00
2023-02-24 11:48:39 +00:00
2022-11-29 17:04:11 +00:00
2022-03-02 22:35:46 +00:00
2021-12-14 21:16:18 +00:00
2023-01-20 15:46:01 +00:00

How to write code in the api/ directory

Mostly, just follow the regular style guide, but:

  • Note that api/ code is not exempt from the “.h and .cc files come in pairs” rule, so if you declare something in api/path/to/foo.h, it should be defined in api/path/to/foo.cc.
  • Headers in api/ should, if possible, not #include headers outside api/. Its not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small mountain of technical debt that were trying to shrink.
  • .cc files in api/, on the other hand, are free to #include headers outside api/.

That is, the preferred way for api/ code to access non-api/ code is to call it from a .cc file, so that users of our API headers wont transitively #include non-public headers.

For headers in api/ that need to refer to non-public types, forward declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The usual rules still apply, though.

.cc files in api/ should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public code, and just call it from the api/ .cc file.