Emil Vardar 78ab1cf39c Enable negotiation of encrypted headers by default.
The negotiation of encrypted header extensions has already been enabled in Chromium, https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5933829. Hence, it make sense to enable the encryption of header extensions by default also in webRTC environment so that all the tests run by taking this into considiration when new changes are made.

Bug: webrtc:358039777
Change-Id: I141fac01b0eb0f2ce5a0a365736f0dcf9f21ddcd
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/366420
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Emil Vardar (xWF) <vardar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Språng <sprang@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#43573}
2024-12-16 01:22:18 -08:00
..
2024-12-12 08:43:25 -08:00
2024-12-11 14:59:08 -08:00
2024-12-11 14:59:08 -08:00
2024-06-19 06:19:20 +00:00
2023-03-27 17:06:33 +00:00
2023-09-07 10:41:49 +00:00

How to write code in the api/ directory

Mostly, just follow the regular style guide, but:

  • Note that api/ code is not exempt from the “.h and .cc files come in pairs” rule, so if you declare something in api/path/to/foo.h, it should be defined in api/path/to/foo.cc.
  • Headers in api/ should, if possible, not #include headers outside api/. Its not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small mountain of technical debt that were trying to shrink.
  • .cc files in api/, on the other hand, are free to #include headers outside api/.
  • Avoid structs in api, prefer classes.

The preferred way for api/ code to access non-api/ code is to call it from a .cc file, so that users of our API headers wont transitively #include non-public headers.

For headers in api/ that need to refer to non-public types, forward declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The usual rules still apply, though.

.cc files in api/ should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public code, and just call it from the api/ .cc file.

Avoid defining api with structs as it makes harder for the api to evolve. Your struct may gain invariant, or change how it represents data. Evolving struct from the api is particular challenging as it is designed to be used in other code bases and thus needs to be updated independetly from its usage. Class with accessors and setters makes such migration safer. See Google C++ style guide for more.

If you need to evolve existent struct in api, prefer first to convert it into a class.