This reverts commit e20fbb00d0e0219b710da24664e81a10b12c703a.
Reason for revert: Breaks WebRTC roll to Chromium, see:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6218060
Example of error: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/chrome/builders/ci/win-arm64-rel-ready/51821/test-results?sortby=&groupby=
Original change's description:
> Get DeviceScaleFactor for the captured monitor/screen
>
> Accesses DeviceScaleFactor using the windows API
> GetScaleFactorForMonitor and adds it to the DesktopFrame. In a follow-up
> CL, this value is propagated to
> DesktopCaptureDevice::Core::OnCaptureResult where it is added to the
> frame metadata.
>
> In a follow-up CL, add RegisterScaleChangeEvent to get notified whenever
> the device scale factor changes.
>
> Design doc: go/expose-captured-surface-resolution
>
> Bug: chromium:383946052
> Change-Id: I363af33c569419d95ddf31a0cc2f9cecf6fb0c7b
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/374344
> Reviewed-by: Henrik Andreassson <henrika@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Foltz <mfoltz@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Palak Agarwal <agpalak@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#43827}
Bug: chromium:383946052
Change-Id: I3065b278939ca0e686ee6da0f0721082bc0c99e8
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/375902
Owners-Override: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Bot-Commit: rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#43829}
Accesses DeviceScaleFactor using the windows API
GetScaleFactorForMonitor and adds it to the DesktopFrame. In a follow-up
CL, this value is propagated to
DesktopCaptureDevice::Core::OnCaptureResult where it is added to the
frame metadata.
In a follow-up CL, add RegisterScaleChangeEvent to get notified whenever
the device scale factor changes.
Design doc: go/expose-captured-surface-resolution
Bug: chromium:383946052
Change-Id: I363af33c569419d95ddf31a0cc2f9cecf6fb0c7b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/374344
Reviewed-by: Henrik Andreassson <henrika@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Foltz <mfoltz@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Palak Agarwal <agpalak@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#43827}
This CL is a follow-up of work done in
https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/323882 where the goal
was to reduce the amount of FrameDropped error logs in
WebRTC.DesktopCapture.Win.WgcCaptureSessionGetFrameResult.
The previous work avoids FrameDropped logs for a minimized window
being captured with WGC but we still se a large amount of these error
(or rather warning) logs. See [1] which comes from Canary.
This CL does two different things to improve the situation:
1) It adds kFramePoolEmpty to the existing
GetFrameResult::kFrameDropped enum to point out that the warning
comes from the frame pool not being able to return a valid new frame.
It also makes it more clear that it does not cause an outer/final
error as WgcCapturerResult::kFrameDropped. We still keep the inner
GetFrameResult::kFrameDropped but it is only produced when the frame
pool returns NULL and our external queue is empty. Hence, a real
frame-drop error. Note that, it is still easy to provoke
kFramePoolEmpty simply by asking for a high resolution at a high rate.
The example in [2] comes from a 4K screen @30fps. Hence, we have not
fixed anything yet.
2) It also increases the size of the internal frame pool from 1 to 2.
This does lead to an almost zero rate of kFramePoolEmpt
warnings at the expense of a slightly reduced max capture rate. BUT,
with 1 as size, we can "see" a higher max capture rate but it is not
a true rate since it comes with a high rate of kFramePoolEmpty
errors. Hence, we "emulate" a high capture rate by simply feeding
copies of the last frame that we had stored in the external queue.
Using 2 leads to a more "true" rate of what we actually can capture
in terms of *new* frames and also a substantially lower rate of
kFramePoolEmpty.
In addition, with 1 as size, if we ask at a too high rate and provide
a copy of the last frame, our CPU adaptation will not reduce its rate
since we think that things are OK when it is actually not.
Also, the samples in [3] and [4] both use 2 as numberOfBuffers
as well.
Let me also mention that with this small change, I a have not been
able to provoke any kFramePoolEmpty error messages.
Finally, geDisplayMedia can be called called with constraints where
min and max framerate is defined. The mechanism which maintains the
min rate is implemented via the RequestRefreshFrame API and it can
be sent to the source (DesktopCaptureDevice) back to back with a
previous timer interrupt for a capture request. Without this change,
these RRFs were also a source of a large amount of
kFramePoolEmpty error logs. With 2 buffers instead; this is no
longer the case.
[1] https://screenshot.googleplex.com/7sfv6HdGXLwyxdj
[2] https://paste.googleplex.com/4795680001359872
[3] https://github.com/robmikh/Win32CaptureSample/blob/master/Win32CaptureSample/SimpleCapture.cpp
[4] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/audio-video-camera/screen-capture#add-the-screen-capture-capability
Bug: chromium:1314868
Change-Id: I73b823b31a993fd2cd6e007b212826dfe1a80012
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/325521
Commit-Queue: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#41079}
Without this change a FrameDropped sample will be added to
WebRTC.DesktopCapture.Win.WgcCaptureSessionGetFrameResult at the
current capture rate as long as a captured window is minimized.
Bug: webrtc:1314868
Change-Id: I9b68675486642e7ca25674df689c207ac94a206e
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/323882
Commit-Queue: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40969}
This CL adds a light-weight detection of "frame content has changed
since last frame" to an existing pass where bytes are copied from a
texture to a DesktopFrame. The resulting boolean can then later be
used to bypass a full detection of if the content is static or not.
As a result, we only check for static content for a small fraction of
all captured WGC frames and this reduces the total load when 0Hz
is enabled for WGC.
Both WGC and 0Hz support for WGC is still behind a flag.
Bug: chromium:1421242
Change-Id: If9e3721c60a244a3919758fe861d56d4b54cb039
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/308821
Reviewed-by: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Henrik Andreassson <henrika@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40299}
* Removes a ~60Hz thread-wakeup signal caused by the FrameArrived event
* Initial power measurements shows a reduced power consumption
* No increase in time to first captured packet found
Bug: chromium:1428592
Change-Id: Ia23b5db0c87e70e5b0d6919394494a24d8944493
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/301200
Reviewed-by: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Henrik Andreassson <henrika@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39861}
* Avoids alloc/dealloc for each captured frame.
* Reduces time to capture first frame.
* Improves performance in terms of max FPS.
Bug: chromium:1412584
Change-Id: Ie16519ad788165c9553451ecea5adff12cd15eea
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/293582
Reviewed-by: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Henrik Andreassson <henrika@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39384}
This reverts commit dd32562f242b247aed8add4efecaf3e20c623b9a.
Reason for revert: Updated the original change to dynamically load
the CoreMessaging.dll instead of statically linking with the .lib.
Original change's description:
> Revert "Wait for frames to arrive in WgcCapturer instead of returning nothing."
>
> This reverts commit 93bb3051490253d56dc1cdab4701b91138a151c3.
>
> Reason for revert: It breaks a test while rolling into Chromium,
> see https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/261780/21#message-4a96e33bfb475f19a618be82bbe72951b23085ef for details.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Wait for frames to arrive in WgcCapturer instead of returning nothing.
> >
> > We're seeing a high instance of "first capture failed" in Chromium when
> > using WGC. We can reduce this by waiting for frames to arrive if there
> > are none in the frame pool instead of returning a temporary error.
> >
> > I've set the maximum time to wait for a frame to 50ms. If no frame
> > arrives before 50ms has elapsed, we will return a temporary error.
> > Added a new test, FirstCaptureSucceeds, to verify that this is working
> > as expected.
> >
> > As part of this I updated the name of the `kCreateFreeThreadedFailed`
> > enum value to `kCreateFramePoolFailed`. The value remains the same
> > since they both report failures in frame pool creation.
> >
> > I also increased `kNumBuffers` from 1 to 2, so that the frame pool can
> > store two frames. This should prevent us from having to wait on the
> > event as frequently. This will increase the latency between capture
> > and display, however. High frame rate applications should not be
> > noticeably affected.
> >
> > Additionally, we uncovered a bug in the OS that prevents window capture
> > when there are displays attached, but none of them are active. Added
> > a new check to `IsWgcSupported` to cover this scenario.
> >
> > Finally, some issues with other WGC tests blocked moving the TryBots
> > to a newer version of Windows. This CL fixes those issues and updates
> > the TryBot configuration.
> >
> > bug: chromium:1314868
> > Change-Id: Id9c4d5ee98621e682ef04864c3848d50e761cdb7
> > Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/261780
> > Reviewed-by: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Jeremy Leconte <jleconte@webrtc.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Austin Orion <auorion@microsoft.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jeremy Leconte <jleconte@google.com>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#37404}
>
> Change-Id: If237df4826fe20b6fe2ca4b57253623321bf33c5
> No-Presubmit: true
> No-Tree-Checks: true
> No-Try: true
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/267460
> Bot-Commit: rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
> Owners-Override: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
> Auto-Submit: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#37408}
Change-Id: I6cc2becd9ed363782ab2f326f58d9401bc8fb820
Bug: chromium:1314868
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/267902
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Leconte <jleconte@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Austin Orion <auorion@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#37470}
This reverts commit 93bb3051490253d56dc1cdab4701b91138a151c3.
Reason for revert: It breaks a test while rolling into Chromium,
see https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/261780/21#message-4a96e33bfb475f19a618be82bbe72951b23085ef for details.
Original change's description:
> Wait for frames to arrive in WgcCapturer instead of returning nothing.
>
> We're seeing a high instance of "first capture failed" in Chromium when
> using WGC. We can reduce this by waiting for frames to arrive if there
> are none in the frame pool instead of returning a temporary error.
>
> I've set the maximum time to wait for a frame to 50ms. If no frame
> arrives before 50ms has elapsed, we will return a temporary error.
> Added a new test, FirstCaptureSucceeds, to verify that this is working
> as expected.
>
> As part of this I updated the name of the `kCreateFreeThreadedFailed`
> enum value to `kCreateFramePoolFailed`. The value remains the same
> since they both report failures in frame pool creation.
>
> I also increased `kNumBuffers` from 1 to 2, so that the frame pool can
> store two frames. This should prevent us from having to wait on the
> event as frequently. This will increase the latency between capture
> and display, however. High frame rate applications should not be
> noticeably affected.
>
> Additionally, we uncovered a bug in the OS that prevents window capture
> when there are displays attached, but none of them are active. Added
> a new check to `IsWgcSupported` to cover this scenario.
>
> Finally, some issues with other WGC tests blocked moving the TryBots
> to a newer version of Windows. This CL fixes those issues and updates
> the TryBot configuration.
>
> bug: chromium:1314868
> Change-Id: Id9c4d5ee98621e682ef04864c3848d50e761cdb7
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/261780
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Leconte <jleconte@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Austin Orion <auorion@microsoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Leconte <jleconte@google.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#37404}
Change-Id: If237df4826fe20b6fe2ca4b57253623321bf33c5
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/267460
Bot-Commit: rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Owners-Override: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Auto-Submit: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#37408}
We're seeing a high instance of "first capture failed" in Chromium when
using WGC. We can reduce this by waiting for frames to arrive if there
are none in the frame pool instead of returning a temporary error.
I've set the maximum time to wait for a frame to 50ms. If no frame
arrives before 50ms has elapsed, we will return a temporary error.
Added a new test, FirstCaptureSucceeds, to verify that this is working
as expected.
As part of this I updated the name of the `kCreateFreeThreadedFailed`
enum value to `kCreateFramePoolFailed`. The value remains the same
since they both report failures in frame pool creation.
I also increased `kNumBuffers` from 1 to 2, so that the frame pool can
store two frames. This should prevent us from having to wait on the
event as frequently. This will increase the latency between capture
and display, however. High frame rate applications should not be
noticeably affected.
Additionally, we uncovered a bug in the OS that prevents window capture
when there are displays attached, but none of them are active. Added
a new check to `IsWgcSupported` to cover this scenario.
Finally, some issues with other WGC tests blocked moving the TryBots
to a newer version of Windows. This CL fixes those issues and updates
the TryBot configuration.
bug: chromium:1314868
Change-Id: Id9c4d5ee98621e682ef04864c3848d50e761cdb7
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/261780
Reviewed-by: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Leconte <jleconte@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Austin Orion <auorion@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Leconte <jleconte@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#37404}
Several tests starting failing when run on trybots on Win10. This CL
fixes several issues that were uncovered.
Issue 1:
Capture failed to start because `get_Size` returned {0, 0}. This is a
known issue in the WGC API that occurs when there are multiple user
sessions on the same machine.
Solution:
Add a `GetSize` method to the `WgcCaptureSource` interface so we can
fallback to other methods if `get_Size` fails.
Issue 2:
The screen capture tests assume there will be displays attached and
fail if there aren't.
Solution:
Always run `IsWgcSupported` for the appropriate capture type.
Issue 3:
ASAN container-overflow in `GetTestWindowIdFromSourceList`
Solution:
Check the validity of the iterator before dereferencing.
Issue 4:
Occasionally, the call to `GetMessage` in the `CloseWindowMidCapture`
test would hang because there were no messages in the queue.
Solution:
Use `PeekMessage` instead which will return if there are no messages.
Bug: webrtc:14002
Change-Id: I69b2f765db87d34a41d6a1796cd5a81f4029be33
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/260202
Reviewed-by: Alexander Cooper <alcooper@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Austin Orion <auorion@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#36802}
This change refactors WgcWindowCapturer into WgcCapturerWin, a source
agnostic capturer, and finishes the implementation to enable both window
and screen capture.
This CL depends on another which must complete first:
196622: Add ability to load CreateDirect3DDeviceFromDXGIDevice from
d3d11.dll | https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/196622
This feature remains off by default behind a build flag, due to it
adding a depency on the Win10 SDK vv10.0.19041 which not all consumers
of WebRTC have upgraded to. A follow up change later will enable the
rtc_enable_win_wgc build flag, but for now it should remain off.
The basic operation of this class is as follows:
Consumers call either WgcCapturerWin::CreateRawWindowCapturer or
CreateRawScreenCapturer to receive a correctly initialized
WgcCapturerWin object suitable for the desired source type.
Callers then indicate via SelectSource and a SourceId the desired
capture target, and the capturer creates an appropriate WgcCaptureSource
for the correct type (window or screen) using the
WgcCaptureSourceFactory supplied at construction.
Next, callers request frames for the currently selected source and the
capturer then creates a WgcCaptureSession and stores it in a map for
more efficient capture of multiple sources.
The WgcCaptureSession is supplied with a GraphicsCaptureItem created by
the WgcCaptureSource. It uses this item to create a
Direct3D11CaptureFramePool and create and start a
GraphicsCaptureSession.
Once started, captured frames will begin to be deposited into the
FramePool. Typically, one would listen for the FrameArrived event and
process the frame then, but due to the synchronous nature of the
DesktopCapturer interface, and to avoid a more complicated multi-
threaded architecture we ignore the FrameArrived event. Instead, we
wait for a request for a frame from the caller, then we check the
FramePool for a frame, and process it on demand.
Processing a frame involves moving the image data from an
ID3D11Texture2D stored in the GPU into a texture that is accessible
from the CPU, and then copying the data into the new WgcDesktopFrame
class. This copy is necessary as otherwise we would need to manage the
lifetimes of the CaptureFrame and ID3D11Texture2D objects, lest the
buffer be invalidated.
Once we've copied the data and returned it to the caller, we can unmap
the texture and exit the scope of the GetFrame method, which will
destruct the CaptureFrame object. At this point, the CaptureSession
will begin capturing a new frame, and will soon deposit it into the
FramePool and we can repeat.
Bug: webrtc:9273
Change-Id: I02263c4fd587df652b04d5267fad8965330d0f5b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/200161
Reviewed-by: Jamie Walch <jamiewalch@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Austin Orion <auorion@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33083}
This reverts commit 61709a3233174618d5ab46e1ee5847e4b150c7ef.
Reason for revert: Some downstream projects have issues building this
change due to the inclusion of the <windows.graphics.capture.h> header
which is newly available in the Win 10 SDK v10.0.19041.
To get around this issue for now, this change adds an off-by-default
build flag for these files. However, in the future we will want to
toggle this flag on, and the downstream projects will either need to
update their SDK versions or toggle this flag in their WebRTC clone.
Original change's description:
> Revert "Begin implementing WGC CaptureFrame"
>
> This reverts commit e820cef5340610b9beebbcb63868743b95b97fcd.
>
> Reason for revert: Breaks downstream client. I will investigate and
> get back with a suggestion to fix.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Begin implementing WGC CaptureFrame
> >
> > This change introduces the design that will allow us to deliver frames
> > synchronously to callers despite the Windows.Graphics.Capture APIs being
> > inherently asynchronous.
> >
> > We achieve this by having WindowCapturerWinWgc create and maintain a
> > WgcCaptureSession object for each window that it is asked to capture a
> > frame for. The capture session object will be the class that actually
> > uses the WGC APIs, and it will store the frames it receives in a frame
> > pool and deliver them via GetMostRecentFrame.
> >
> > The next CL will add the necessary functionality to the
> > WgcCaptureSession class.
> >
> > Bug: webrtc:9273
> > Change-Id: I44e164f4874503d8ccc8e6a210e74f9c8458f6c4
> > Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/184220
> > Commit-Queue: Austin Orion <auorion@microsoft.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32240}
>
> TBR=mbonadei@webrtc.org,jamiewalch@chromium.org,tommi@webrtc.org,auorion@microsoft.com
>
> Change-Id: I114944357ce5be7d1e2da817703dc95d544aa99a
> No-Presubmit: true
> No-Tree-Checks: true
> No-Try: true
> Bug: webrtc:9273
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/186045
> Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32248}
Bug: webrtc:9273
Change-Id: I9644fbf8f1fd1a84cb716176b8f14e3683a3f7cb
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/186423
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32286}
This reverts commit e820cef5340610b9beebbcb63868743b95b97fcd.
Reason for revert: Breaks downstream client. I will investigate and
get back with a suggestion to fix.
Original change's description:
> Begin implementing WGC CaptureFrame
>
> This change introduces the design that will allow us to deliver frames
> synchronously to callers despite the Windows.Graphics.Capture APIs being
> inherently asynchronous.
>
> We achieve this by having WindowCapturerWinWgc create and maintain a
> WgcCaptureSession object for each window that it is asked to capture a
> frame for. The capture session object will be the class that actually
> uses the WGC APIs, and it will store the frames it receives in a frame
> pool and deliver them via GetMostRecentFrame.
>
> The next CL will add the necessary functionality to the
> WgcCaptureSession class.
>
> Bug: webrtc:9273
> Change-Id: I44e164f4874503d8ccc8e6a210e74f9c8458f6c4
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/184220
> Commit-Queue: Austin Orion <auorion@microsoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32240}
TBR=mbonadei@webrtc.org,jamiewalch@chromium.org,tommi@webrtc.org,auorion@microsoft.com
Change-Id: I114944357ce5be7d1e2da817703dc95d544aa99a
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:9273
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/186045
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32248}
This change introduces the design that will allow us to deliver frames
synchronously to callers despite the Windows.Graphics.Capture APIs being
inherently asynchronous.
We achieve this by having WindowCapturerWinWgc create and maintain a
WgcCaptureSession object for each window that it is asked to capture a
frame for. The capture session object will be the class that actually
uses the WGC APIs, and it will store the frames it receives in a frame
pool and deliver them via GetMostRecentFrame.
The next CL will add the necessary functionality to the
WgcCaptureSession class.
Bug: webrtc:9273
Change-Id: I44e164f4874503d8ccc8e6a210e74f9c8458f6c4
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/184220
Commit-Queue: Austin Orion <auorion@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32240}
