These features are not in use.
Bug: webrtc:12707
Change-Id: Ibe9fcae5e3fd7cb7ca289af80dad8480288c9ba3
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/323601
Commit-Queue: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Diep Bui <diepbp@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40938}
A follow up cl/ is to remove passing upper link capacity from goog_cc to loss_based_bwe_v2.
Bug: webrtc:12707
Change-Id: I45af8ca6e8ba185700d0b7eb57004d2b61edeb9e
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/320780
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Diep Bui <diepbp@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40780}
The purpose is to not allow an initial low link capacity estimate to reduce the current estimate.
Only delay overuse detection , low probe results or a loss event can
reduce the estimate.
Bug: webrtc:14392
Change-Id: Ib1618347f2c7681e3bd65d85ee687dec3cd67c97
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/320380
Reviewed-by: Diep Bui <diepbp@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40751}
The sequence number is generally not used for the estimation,
but may be used as a tie-breaker when ordering packet feedbacks.
Bug: b/299667054
Change-Id: I52a5145c889c8f6924838667cc267b1cd9565f7b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/320240
Commit-Queue: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40749}
Experiments has not showed significant metric changes. However, simulations has showed that RobustThroughputEstimator better follow the actually receive rate better. Especially during bursts of sent packets. Code is also simpler.
Bug: webrtc:13402 chromium:1411666
Change-Id: I38c309f74e8e1322602196354545b3a465866263
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/318040
Reviewed-by: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40653}
Start using RobustThoughputEstimator in DelayBasedBwe test in preparation for making it default.
Experiments has not showed significant metric changes. However, simulations has showed that RobustThroughputEstimator better follow the actually receive rate better. Especially during bursts of sent packets. Code is also simpler.
Bug: webrtc:13402 chromium:1411666
Change-Id: I83cfa1fc15486982b18cc22fbd0752ff59c1c1b4
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/317600
Reviewed-by: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40644}
which is the maximum allowed in RFC 3550:
The last octet of the padding contains a count of how
many padding octets should be ignored, including itself
SRTP encryption does not need to be taken into account since none of
the cipher suites used by WebRTC require padding:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3711#section-3.1https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7714#section-7.2
BUG=webrtc:15182
Change-Id: Ife3d264af389509733699f2dd4d32ba63793e9de
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/305642
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Philipp Hancke <phancke@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40101}
Ensure probes are not created until after the transport becomes writable even if the network route change.
DTLS negotiation must complete before there is a point in sending probes.
Bug: webrtc:14928
Change-Id: Ib3cb93aef9f38e306b094dd700ed595cf9eb3f32
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/301362
Reviewed-by: Diep Bui <diepbp@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39870}
Pass FieldTrialsView by const& to note it can't be null and doesn't need to outlive the constructor
In unittests use AimdRateControl object directly instead of through helpers
Use unit types (TimeDelta, DataRate) directly, reducing their conversion to plain numbers
Replace SimulatedClock with a single Timestamp now variable or constant
Bug: None
Change-Id: I147f85e629b4d8923aa19896ea211a6f9dca1e68
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/299260
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39707}
Instead of use probe_bitrate as the bandwidth estimate, the change uses probe bitrate as the bandwidth limit.
The experiment is not started, so it does not affect production.
Bug: webrtc:12707
Change-Id: Iefd8cdfe87983057489e551816bf5d4cb38f7c9f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/296040
Commit-Queue: Diep Bui <diepbp@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39603}
Packet pending time should be diffed between max_revc_time and receive time as it is done at line 436. The current implementation makes pending time to be negative.
Bug: webrtc:14850
Change-Id: Ie6590ef11caa67254750591abb6bf72679d76941
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/292461
Commit-Queue: Diep Bui <diepbp@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39311}
Today, behaviour is decided based on if transport sequence number v2 is
in the SDP answer. But it might be better to decide based on received
packets since it is valid to negotiate both extensions.
Another bonus With this solution is that Call does not need to know
about receive header exensions.
This is an alternative to https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/291337
Bug: webrtc:7135
Change-Id: Ib75474127d6e2e2029557b8bb2528eaac66979f8
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/291525
Reviewed-by: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Kron <kron@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39226}
Keeping the headers to allow compatibility with current users
that expect the headers to be in that target before they are
also updated.
Bug: webrtc:9838
Change-Id: I8b1e88850958e92c043686587a37791f01860220
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/290569
Commit-Queue: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Auto-Submit: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39031}
This will enable loss based bwe v2 by default. The default params were used in Chrome experiment and got positive result. Remove some tests in goog_cc, which are for loss based bwe v1.
Bug: webrtc:12707
Change-Id: Ice126a128f6e8cea8b861f879d09e390ee69e521
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/285740
Commit-Queue: Diep Bui <diepbp@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#38851}
When best candidate estimate increases above the delay based estimate, the state should be DelayBasedEstimate because the final esimate is bounded by delay based bwe anyway.
Bug: webrtc:12707
Change-Id: I0bcae684b33e5f1e9a7c57cb32c431b4eb58fd35
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/283802
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Diep Bui <diepbp@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#38677}
Add loss_limited_probe_scale as a scale factor which decides how much we should probe when bandwidth is loss limited.
Bug: webrtc:12707
Change-Id: I194b2b40c9a7861d82b61585bcaf484ab228eedb
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/281360
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Diep Bui <diepbp@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#38636}
Motivation: loss based ramp-up can be incorrect when (1) bandwidth is loss limited, and (2) delay based estimate might be incorrect due to no delay signals. Therefore, bounding the loss based estimate by the delay based estimate is not much helpful in those cases.
Thus strengthening the bounding logic by using upper link capacity is one of solutions to avoid incorrect ramp-up.
Without the change: screen/qmLedxapJWvUTmn
With the change: screen/8sQcksWa6CptywK
Bug: webrtc:12707
Change-Id: I32ba82693b3ffa83cbb89c2cc9690fe16fb10c78
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/283085
Commit-Queue: Diep Bui <diepbp@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#38626}
Patchset 1 contrains the original cl.
Later patchsets contain fix.
Original description:
Continue probing if networkstat estimate increase
This fixes an issue where continues probing stops if networkstate estimate is low when a probe is sent, but increase as a consequence of the probe.
Bug: webrtc:14392
Change-Id: I8d4e1968020f9f8de18e12a4a0322a87f1a8fd2f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/283082
Reviewed-by: Diep Bui <diepbp@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#38612}
