The new constructor introduces two new changes:
* Support specifying thread priority at construction time.
- Moving forward, the SetPriority() method will be removed.
* New thread function type.
- The new type has 'void' as a return type and a polling loop
inside PlatformThread, is not used.
The old function type is still supported until all places have been moved over.
In this CL, the first steps towards deprecating the old mechanism are taken
by moving parts of the code that were simple to move, over to the new callback
type.
BUG=webrtc:7187
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2708723003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#16779}
Multimedia timers are higher precision than WM_TIMER, but they're also
a limited resource and more costly. So this implementation is a best
effort implementation that falls back on WM_TIMER when multimedia
timers aren't available.
A possible future change could be to make high precision timers in a
TaskQueue, optional. The reason for doing so would be for TaskQueues
that don't need high precision timers, won't eat up timers from TQ
instances that really need it.
BUG=webrtc:7151
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2691973002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#16661}
The issue was that if the main entry routine of the thread would get called before the first APC, the thread would hang on a GetMessage() call and the APC sent to initialize the thread, would never run.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2139723003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13438}
Every message will now be traced with the location from which it was
posted, including function name, file and line number.
This CL also writes a normal LOG message when the dispatch took more
than a certain amount of time (currently 50ms).
This logging should help us identify messages that are taking
longer than expected to be dispatched.
R=pthatcher@webrtc.org, tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2019423006 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13104}
ACCESS_ON is an alias of GUARDED_BY but should take thread-like object instead of mutex,
RUN_ON is an alias of EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED to annotate function always run on same
thread/task_queue
RTC_DCHECK_RUN_ON - creates an object that allows use of annotated variables and functions, and adds a run-time DCHECK given thread/queue is current.
R=tommi@webrtc.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1981893002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12812}
New task queueing primitive for async tasks: TaskQueue.
TaskQueue is a new way to asynchronously execute tasks sequentially
in a thread safe manner with minimal locking. The implementation
uses OS supported APIs to do this that are compatible with async IO
notifications from things like sockets and files.
This class is a part of rtc_base_approved, so can be used by both
the webrtc and libjingle parts of the WebRTC library. Moving forward,
we can replace rtc::Thread and webrtc::ProcessThread with this implementation.
NOTE: It should not be assumed that all tasks that execute on a TaskQueue,
run on the same thread. E.g. on Mac and iOS, we use GCD dispatch queues
which means that tasks might execute on different threads depending on
what's the most efficient thing to do.
TBR=perkj@webrtc.org,phoglund@webrtc.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1984503002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12749}
Reason for revert:
sigh. Have to revert again as there seems to have have been some change made for pnacl and CrOS.
Original issue's description:
> Reland of New task queueing primitive for async tasks: TaskQueue. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/1935483002/ )
>
> New task queueing primitive for async tasks: TaskQueue.
> TaskQueue is a new way to asynchronously execute tasks sequentially
> in a thread safe manner with minimal locking. The implementation
> uses OS supported APIs to do this that are compatible with async IO
> notifications from things like sockets and files.
>
> This class is a part of rtc_base_approved, so can be used by both
> the webrtc and libjingle parts of the WebRTC library. Moving forward,
> we can replace rtc::Thread and webrtc::ProcessThread with this implementation.
>
> NOTE: It should not be assumed that all tasks that execute on a TaskQueue,
> run on the same thread. E.g. on Mac and iOS, we use GCD dispatch queues
> which means that tasks might execute on different threads depending on
> what's the most efficient thing to do.
>
> TBR=perkj@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/65d1f2aba216d077c6d22488f03e56984aef1c68
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12737}
TBR=perkj@webrtc.org,phoglund@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1981573002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12738}
New task queueing primitive for async tasks: TaskQueue.
TaskQueue is a new way to asynchronously execute tasks sequentially
in a thread safe manner with minimal locking. The implementation
uses OS supported APIs to do this that are compatible with async IO
notifications from things like sockets and files.
This class is a part of rtc_base_approved, so can be used by both
the webrtc and libjingle parts of the WebRTC library. Moving forward,
we can replace rtc::Thread and webrtc::ProcessThread with this implementation.
NOTE: It should not be assumed that all tasks that execute on a TaskQueue,
run on the same thread. E.g. on Mac and iOS, we use GCD dispatch queues
which means that tasks might execute on different threads depending on
what's the most efficient thing to do.
TBR=perkj@webrtc.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1927133004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12737}
Reason for revert:
Reverting this temporarily while I figure out the issues with the Chrome on android GN debug build.
Original issue's description:
> New task queueing primitive for async tasks: TaskQueue.
> TaskQueue is a new way to asynchronously execute tasks sequentially
> in a thread safe manner with minimal locking. The implementation
> uses OS supported APIs to do this that are compatible with async IO
> notifications from things like sockets and files.
>
> This class is a part of rtc_base_approved, so can be used by both
> the webrtc and libjingle parts of the WebRTC library. Moving forward,
> we can replace rtc::Thread and webrtc::ProcessThread with this implementation.
>
> NOTE: It should not be assumed that all tasks that execute on a TaskQueue,
> run on the same thread. E.g. on Mac and iOS, we use GCD dispatch queues
> which means that tasks might execute on different threads depending on
> what's the most efficient thing to do.
TBR=perkj@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1935483002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12562}
TaskQueue is a new way to asynchronously execute tasks sequentially
in a thread safe manner with minimal locking. The implementation
uses OS supported APIs to do this that are compatible with async IO
notifications from things like sockets and files.
This class is a part of rtc_base_approved, so can be used by both
the webrtc and libjingle parts of the WebRTC library. Moving forward,
we can replace rtc::Thread and webrtc::ProcessThread with this implementation.
NOTE: It should not be assumed that all tasks that execute on a TaskQueue,
run on the same thread. E.g. on Mac and iOS, we use GCD dispatch queues
which means that tasks might execute on different threads depending on
what's the most efficient thing to do.
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1919733002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12561}
