magjed f823ededce Negotiate H264 profiles in SDP
This CL will start to distinguish H264 profiles during SDP negotiation.
We currently don't look at the H264 profile at all and assume they are
all Constrained Baseline Level 3.1. This CL will start to check profiles
for equality when matching, and will generate the correct answer H264
level.

Each local supported H264 profile needs to be listed explicitly in the
list of local supported codecs, even if they are redundant. For example,
Baseline profile should be listed explicitly even though another profile
that is a superset of Baseline is also listed. The reason for this is to
simplify the code and avoid profile intersection during matching. So
VideoCodec::Matches will check for profile equality, and not check if
one codec is a subset of the other. This also leads to the nice property
that VideoCodec::Matches is symmetric, i.e. iif a.Matches(b) then
b.Matches(a).

BUG=webrtc:6337
TBR=tkchin@webrtc.org

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2483173002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#15051}
2016-11-12 17:53:08 +00:00
2016-11-12 17:53:08 +00:00
2016-06-14 09:39:40 +00:00
2015-09-11 09:04:09 +00:00
2016-10-19 11:52:19 +00:00

WebRTC is a free, open software project that provides browsers and mobile applications with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose.

Our mission: To enable rich, high-quality RTC applications to be developed for the browser, mobile platforms, and IoT devices, and allow them all to communicate via a common set of protocols.

The WebRTC initiative is a project supported by Google, Mozilla and Opera, amongst others. This page is maintained by the Google Chrome team.

Development

See http://www.webrtc.org/native-code/development for instructions on how to get started developing with the native code.

More info

Description
The idea is to make CMake build for WebRTC m130 version - for audio processing module
Readme BSD-3-Clause 446 MiB
Languages
C++ 90.3%
Java 2.9%
C 2.2%
Objective-C++ 2%
Python 1.3%
Other 1%