Johannes Kron 96dbc60704 Fix fallback implementation name
The fallback implementation currently returns "...(fallback from
unknown)" since ImplemenationName() is deprecated. Fix this by
using GetDecoderInfo() to determine the implementation name.

Bug: webrtc:12271
Change-Id: Ifa1d97678cd1bf05d9b5a10b73da23c4d54a1e05
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/257901
Reviewed-by: Erik Språng <sprang@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Johannes Kron <kron@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#36440}
2022-04-05 08:28:23 +00:00
..
2021-11-30 10:31:16 +00:00
2021-08-16 14:38:57 +00:00
2022-03-23 10:23:54 +00:00
2022-03-23 10:23:54 +00:00
2022-03-02 22:35:46 +00:00
2021-08-31 14:27:49 +00:00
2021-12-14 21:16:18 +00:00
2022-03-23 10:23:54 +00:00
2022-03-23 10:23:54 +00:00
2021-06-11 12:59:37 +00:00

How to write code in the api/ directory

Mostly, just follow the regular style guide, but:

  • Note that api/ code is not exempt from the “.h and .cc files come in pairs” rule, so if you declare something in api/path/to/foo.h, it should be defined in api/path/to/foo.cc.
  • Headers in api/ should, if possible, not #include headers outside api/. Its not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small mountain of technical debt that were trying to shrink.
  • .cc files in api/, on the other hand, are free to #include headers outside api/.

That is, the preferred way for api/ code to access non-api/ code is to call it from a .cc file, so that users of our API headers wont transitively #include non-public headers.

For headers in api/ that need to refer to non-public types, forward declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The usual rules still apply, though.

.cc files in api/ should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public code, and just call it from the api/ .cc file.