Jonathan Yu 3ffa72d0f0 Add AudioFrame::ResetWithoutMuting() to address performance regression.
Prior to https://codereview.webrtc.org/2750783004/ Reset() intentionally
did not zero out the buffer. After that change, callers calling Reset()
and then mutable_data() were performing a wasteful zeroing.

This change adds ResetWithoutMuting() to match the old behavior and
switches the sole non-test caller of Reset() to use ResetWithoutMuting()
instead.

Prior to this change (optimized, Linux):
$ out/Default/webrtc_perf_tests --gtest_filter=NetEqPerformanceTest.Run* \
  --gtest_repeat=10 | grep neteq_performance
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 4051 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1768 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3666 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1690 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3685 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1693 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3720 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1690 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3780 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1728 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3733 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1737 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3781 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1744 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3712 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1731 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3681 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1691 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3681 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1690 ms

With this change:
$ out/Default/webrtc_perf_tests --gtest_filter=NetEqPerformanceTest.Run* \
  --gtest_repeat=10 | grep neteq_performance
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3824 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1632 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3502 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1521 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3520 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1534 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3517 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1530 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3521 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1527 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3511 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1533 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3518 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1523 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3503 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1524 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3514 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1534 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 10_pl_10_drift= 3501 ms
*RESULT neteq_performance: 0_pl_0_drift= 1530 ms

BUG=webrtc:7343,chromium:738852,chromium:738839

Change-Id: Idcbb276ca0ed27fff95164a73f1c1fa310175ee5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/563021
Reviewed-by: Henrik Lundin <henrik.lundin@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Olga Sharonova <olka@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18939}
2017-07-08 23:36:26 +00:00
2017-06-30 10:04:59 +00:00
.gn
2017-06-01 20:01:48 +00:00
2017-06-30 10:04:59 +00:00
2017-01-20 20:45:07 +00:00
2017-03-23 10:46:00 +00:00

WebRTC is a free, open software project that provides browsers and mobile applications with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose.

Our mission: To enable rich, high-quality RTC applications to be developed for the browser, mobile platforms, and IoT devices, and allow them all to communicate via a common set of protocols.

The WebRTC initiative is a project supported by Google, Mozilla and Opera, amongst others.

Development

See http://www.webrtc.org/native-code/development for instructions on how to get started developing with the native code.

More info

Description
The idea is to make CMake build for WebRTC m130 version - for audio processing module
Readme BSD-3-Clause 446 MiB
Languages
C++ 90.3%
Java 2.9%
C 2.2%
Objective-C++ 2%
Python 1.3%
Other 1%