Danil Chapovalov 07a4f2b267 Merge rtc_task_queue(_api|_impl)? build targets into one
Ignore rtc_link_task_queue_impl flag,
instead use build_with_chromium for custom chromium implementation injection

This changes TaskQueue implementation used in webrtc fuzzers in chromium:
from own webrtc implementation to chromium's.

Bug: webrtc:10191
Change-Id: I63be28b680ae8ea8ee1dbf0c699263c392ce29d3
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/125196
Commit-Queue: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Karl Wiberg <kwiberg@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26977}
2019-03-05 20:13:38 +00:00
..
2019-02-20 16:02:59 +00:00
2019-03-04 21:55:02 +00:00
2019-03-01 07:02:42 +00:00
2019-01-25 20:29:58 +00:00
2019-02-01 13:24:47 +00:00

How to write code in the api/ directory

Mostly, just follow the regular style guide, but:

  • Note that api/ code is not exempt from the “.h and .cc files come in pairs” rule, so if you declare something in api/path/to/foo.h, it should be defined in api/path/to/foo.cc.
  • Headers in api/ should, if possible, not #include headers outside api/. Its not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small mountain of technical debt that were trying to shrink.
  • .cc files in api/, on the other hand, are free to #include headers outside api/.

That is, the preferred way for api/ code to access non-api/ code is to call it from a .cc file, so that users of our API headers wont transitively #include non-public headers.

For headers in api/ that need to refer to non-public types, forward declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The usual rules still apply, though.

.cc files in api/ should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public code, and just call it from the api/ .cc file.