Anton Sukhanov 762076b886 Add flag to use datagram transport (without implementation)
Integration with datagram transport will come in next CLs.

NOTE that since we now have implemented negotiation for media transport, we can replace configuration flags with field trials, but it will be done later for both media and datagram transports.

Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Icf062d030899d53d5646977ba195d1634050704b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/137820
Commit-Queue: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27996}
2019-05-20 22:42:31 +00:00
..
2019-05-17 16:14:32 +00:00
2019-04-12 07:36:49 +00:00
2019-05-08 12:29:42 +00:00
2019-01-25 20:29:58 +00:00
2019-02-01 13:24:47 +00:00

How to write code in the api/ directory

Mostly, just follow the regular style guide, but:

  • Note that api/ code is not exempt from the “.h and .cc files come in pairs” rule, so if you declare something in api/path/to/foo.h, it should be defined in api/path/to/foo.cc.
  • Headers in api/ should, if possible, not #include headers outside api/. Its not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small mountain of technical debt that were trying to shrink.
  • .cc files in api/, on the other hand, are free to #include headers outside api/.

That is, the preferred way for api/ code to access non-api/ code is to call it from a .cc file, so that users of our API headers wont transitively #include non-public headers.

For headers in api/ that need to refer to non-public types, forward declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The usual rules still apply, though.

.cc files in api/ should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public code, and just call it from the api/ .cc file.