Florent Castelli 01343031cd datachannel: Don't close a data channel when the queue is full
According to https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/#datachannel-send it should
return an error, definitely not close the data channel.
While we should probably return an RTCError will better information, this
would break the API and will be done later.

Bug: webrtc:13289
Change-Id: I90baf012440fbe2a38a826cf50b50b2b668fd7ff
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/237180
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#35306}
2021-11-04 11:40:28 +00:00
..
2021-10-26 11:55:31 +00:00
2021-11-01 09:48:50 +00:00
2021-08-16 14:38:57 +00:00
2021-08-31 14:27:49 +00:00
2021-06-11 12:59:37 +00:00

How to write code in the api/ directory

Mostly, just follow the regular style guide, but:

  • Note that api/ code is not exempt from the “.h and .cc files come in pairs” rule, so if you declare something in api/path/to/foo.h, it should be defined in api/path/to/foo.cc.
  • Headers in api/ should, if possible, not #include headers outside api/. Its not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small mountain of technical debt that were trying to shrink.
  • .cc files in api/, on the other hand, are free to #include headers outside api/.

That is, the preferred way for api/ code to access non-api/ code is to call it from a .cc file, so that users of our API headers wont transitively #include non-public headers.

For headers in api/ that need to refer to non-public types, forward declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The usual rules still apply, though.

.cc files in api/ should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public code, and just call it from the api/ .cc file.