The problem with gmock is worked around by commenting out any other override declarations in classes using gmock.
NOPRESUBMIT=True
BUG=webrtc:3970
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1921653002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12563}
Reason for revert:
Revert breaks other uses, a fix will be rolled into Chromium instead.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Remove ignored return code from modules. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/1703833002/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Breaks Chromium.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Remove ignored return code from modules.
> >
> > ModuleProcessImpl doesn't act on return codes and having them around is
> > confusing (it's unclear what an error return code here would do even).
> >
> > BUG=
> > R=tommi@webrtc.org
> >
> > Committed: f14c47a58c
>
> TBR=tommi@webrtc.org,pbos@webrtc.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/da33a8a2a22f6d19ba2a8cce963beafbdbaa8fd8
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11761}
TBR=tommi@webrtc.org,torbjorng@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1737013002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11762}
Reason for revert:
Breaks Chromium.
Original issue's description:
> Remove ignored return code from modules.
>
> ModuleProcessImpl doesn't act on return codes and having them around is
> confusing (it's unclear what an error return code here would do even).
>
> BUG=
> R=tommi@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: f14c47a58cTBR=tommi@webrtc.org,pbos@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1736663004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11761}
ModuleProcessImpl doesn't act on return codes and having them around is
confusing (it's unclear what an error return code here would do even).
BUG=
R=tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1703833002 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11747}
In addition to the code moved from talk/app/webrtc
there were some files in webrtc/api/objctests that still
had the libjingle license header.
BUG=webrtc:5418
TBR=tkchin@webrtc.org
NOTRY=True
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1680293005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11552}
The previously disabled warnings that were inherited from
talk/build/common.gypi are now replaced by target-specific disabling
of only the failing warnings. Additional disabling was needed since the stricter
compilation warnings that applies to code in webrtc/.
License headers will be updated in a follow-up CL.
Other modifications:
* Updated the header guards.
* Sorted the includes using chromium/src/tools/sort-headers.py
except for these files:
talk/app/webrtc/peerconnectionendtoend_unittest.cc
talk/app/webrtc/java/jni/androidmediadecoder_jni.cc
talk/app/webrtc/java/jni/androidmediaencoder_jni.cc
webrtc/media/devices/win32devicemanager.cc
The HAVE_SCTP define was added for the peerconnection_unittests target
in api_tests.gyp.
I also checked that none of
SRTP_RELATIVE_PATH
HAVE_SRTP
HAVE_WEBRTC_VIDEO
HAVE_WEBRTC_VOICE
were used by the talk/app/webrtc code.
For Chromium, the following changes will need to be applied to the roll CL that updates the
DEPS for WebRTC and libjingle:
https://codereview.chromium.org/1615433002
BUG=webrtc:5418
NOPRESUBMIT=True
R=deadbeef@webrtc.org, pthatcher@webrtc.org, tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1610243002 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11545}
