The latter file was more up-to-date. The files are now identical
with the following exceptions:
* The namespace used (rtc vs. webrtc).
* The name of the include guard.
* base/scoped_ptr.h still has two extra methods, accept() and use().
* base/scoped_ptr.h still includes webrtc/base/common.h even though
it doesn't need it itself, since several .cc files expect to get
it for free by incuding base/scoped_ptr.h. This is of course bad
manners, and the "unused" include will be removed in a future CL.
A later CL will remove system_wrappers/interface/scoped_ptr.h.
R=andrew@webrtc.org
Committed: https://code.google.com/p/webrtc/source/detail?r=8147
And reverted again, because out-of-tree code using this file was defining nullptr to 0: https://code.google.com/p/webrtc/source/detail?r=8149
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/36919004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#8196}
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8196 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
The latter file was more up-to-date. The files are now identical
with the following exceptions:
* The namespace used (rtc vs. webrtc).
* The name of the include guard.
* base/scoped_ptr.h still has two extra methods, accept() and use().
* base/scoped_ptr.h still includes webrtc/base/common.h even though
it doesn't need it itself, since several .cc files expect to get
it for free by incuding base/scoped_ptr.h. This is of course bad
manners, and the "unused" include will be removed in a future CL.
A later CL will remove system_wrappers/interface/scoped_ptr.h.
R=andrew@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/36919004
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8147 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
