14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
tommi
ede0759c04 Reland of Use TaskQueue in IncomingVideoStream (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2714393003/ )
Use TaskQueue in IncomingVideoStream instead of the PlatformThread + event timer approach.

TBR=mflodman@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=webrtc:7219, webrtc:7253

Reland of
686aa37382 (revert)
e2d1d64295 (original)

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2720773002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#16872}
2017-02-27 15:16:10 +00:00
tommi
686aa37382 Revert of Use TaskQueue in IncomingVideoStream (patchset #10 id:320001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2716473002/ )
Reason for revert:
Reverting while fixing build issue in Chromium.

Original issue's description:
> Use TaskQueue in IncomingVideoStream instead of the PlatformThread + event timer approach.
>
> BUG=webrtc:7219, webrtc:7253
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2716473002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#16860}
> Committed: e2d1d64295

TBR=mflodman@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=webrtc:7219, webrtc:7253

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2714393003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#16863}
2017-02-27 13:10:37 +00:00
tommi
e2d1d64295 Use TaskQueue in IncomingVideoStream instead of the PlatformThread + event timer approach.
BUG=webrtc:7219, webrtc:7253

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2716473002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#16860}
2017-02-27 12:40:43 +00:00
nisse
af916899cc Move VideoFrame and related declarations to webrtc/api/video.
Moves webrtc/common_video/rotation.h and parts of
webrtc/common_video/include/video_frame_buffer.h and
webrtc/video_frame.h, and adds to a new GN target api:video_frame_api.

BUG=webrtc:5880

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2517173004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#15993}
2017-01-10 15:44:26 +00:00
tommi
2e82f3821f Reland of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2084873002/ )
Reason for revert:
Reverting the revert.  This change is not related to the failure on the Windows FYI bots.  The cause of the failure has been reverted in Chromium:
https://codereview.chromium.org/2081653004/

Original issue's description:
> Revert of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without. (patchset #5 id:340001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2078873002/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Breaks chromium.webrtc.fyi
>
> https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.webrtc.fyi/builders/Win7%20Tester/builds/4719
> https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.webrtc.fyi/builders/Win10%20Tester/builds/3120
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Reland of IncomingVideoStream refactoring.
> > This reland does not contain the non-smoothing part of the original implementation.  Instead, when smoothing is turned off, frame callbacks run on the decoder thread, as they did before.  This code path is used in Chrome.  As far as Chrome goes, the difference now is that there won't be an instance of IncomingVideoStream in between the decoder and the callback (i.e. fewer locks).  Other than that, no change for Chrome.
> >
> > Original issue's description (with non-smoothing references removed):
> >
> > Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
> >
> > * Added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 6 locks.
> >
> > * Removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.
> >
> > * Changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).
> >
> > * The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.
> >
> > * Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)
> >
> > * Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.
> >
> > * Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.
> >
> > * Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.
> >
> > BUG=chromium:620232
> > R=mflodman@webrtc.org, nisse@webrtc.org
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/884c336c345d988974c2a69cea402b0fb8b07a63
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13219}
>
> TBR=nisse@webrtc.org,philipel@webrtc.org,mflodman@webrtc.org,tommi@webrtc.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=chromium:620232
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/a536bfe70de38fe877245317a7f0b00bcf69cbd0
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13229}

TBR=nisse@webrtc.org,philipel@webrtc.org,mflodman@webrtc.org,sakal@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:620232

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2089613002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13230}
2016-06-21 07:26:48 +00:00
sakal
a536bfe70d Revert of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without. (patchset #5 id:340001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2078873002/ )
Reason for revert:
Breaks chromium.webrtc.fyi

https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.webrtc.fyi/builders/Win7%20Tester/builds/4719
https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.webrtc.fyi/builders/Win10%20Tester/builds/3120

Original issue's description:
> Reland of IncomingVideoStream refactoring.
> This reland does not contain the non-smoothing part of the original implementation.  Instead, when smoothing is turned off, frame callbacks run on the decoder thread, as they did before.  This code path is used in Chrome.  As far as Chrome goes, the difference now is that there won't be an instance of IncomingVideoStream in between the decoder and the callback (i.e. fewer locks).  Other than that, no change for Chrome.
>
> Original issue's description (with non-smoothing references removed):
>
> Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
>
> * Added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 6 locks.
>
> * Removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.
>
> * Changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).
>
> * The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.
>
> * Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)
>
> * Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.
>
> * Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.
>
> * Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.
>
> BUG=chromium:620232
> R=mflodman@webrtc.org, nisse@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/884c336c345d988974c2a69cea402b0fb8b07a63
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13219}

TBR=nisse@webrtc.org,philipel@webrtc.org,mflodman@webrtc.org,tommi@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:620232

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2084873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13229}
2016-06-21 07:08:58 +00:00
Tommi
884c336c34 Reland of IncomingVideoStream refactoring.
This reland does not contain the non-smoothing part of the original implementation.  Instead, when smoothing is turned off, frame callbacks run on the decoder thread, as they did before.  This code path is used in Chrome.  As far as Chrome goes, the difference now is that there won't be an instance of IncomingVideoStream in between the decoder and the callback (i.e. fewer locks).  Other than that, no change for Chrome.

Original issue's description (with non-smoothing references removed):

Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.

* Added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 6 locks.

* Removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.

* Changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).

* The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.

* Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)

* Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.

* Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.

* Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.

BUG=chromium:620232
R=mflodman@webrtc.org, nisse@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2078873002 .

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13219}
2016-06-20 17:43:10 +00:00
tommi
8e8222d0d2 Revert of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without. (patchset #4 id:290001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2071473002/ )
Reason for revert:
Reverting again.  The perf regression does not seem to be related to dropping frames.

Original issue's description:
> Reland of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
>
> Original issue's description:
>
> Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
>
> This CL fixes an issue with the non-smoothing implementation where frames were delivered on the decoder thread.  No-smoothing is now done in a separate class that uses a TaskQueue.  The implementation may drop frames if the renderer doesn't keep up and it doesn't block the decoder thread.
>
> Further work done:
>
> * I added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 5 locks.
>
> * I removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.
>
> * I changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).
>
> * The non-smoothing IncomingVideoStream implementation currently allows only 1 outstanding pending frame.  If we exceed that, the current frame won't be delivered to the renderer and instead we deliver the next one (since when this happens, the renderer is falling behind).
>
> * The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.
>
> * Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)
>
> * Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.
>
> * Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.
>
> * Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.
>
> BUG=chromium:620232
> TBR=mflodman
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/e03f8787377bbc03a4e00184bb14b7561b108cbb
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13175}

TBR=mflodman@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:620232

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2071093002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13176}
2016-06-16 22:44:11 +00:00
tommi
e03f878737 Reland of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
Original issue's description:

Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.

This CL fixes an issue with the non-smoothing implementation where frames were delivered on the decoder thread.  No-smoothing is now done in a separate class that uses a TaskQueue.  The implementation may drop frames if the renderer doesn't keep up and it doesn't block the decoder thread.

Further work done:

* I added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 5 locks.

* I removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.

* I changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).

* The non-smoothing IncomingVideoStream implementation currently allows only 1 outstanding pending frame.  If we exceed that, the current frame won't be delivered to the renderer and instead we deliver the next one (since when this happens, the renderer is falling behind).

* The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.

* Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)

* Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.

* Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.

* Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.

BUG=chromium:620232
TBR=mflodman

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2071473002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13175}
2016-06-16 20:29:12 +00:00
tommi
17c3cddf9d Revert of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without. (patchset #23 id:430001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2035173002/ )
Reason for revert:
Reverting while we track down the issue on the Win10 bot.

Original issue's description:
> Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
>
> This CL fixes an issue with the non-smoothing implementation where frames were delivered on the decoder thread.  No-smoothing is now done in a separate class that uses a TaskQueue.  The implementation may drop frames if the renderer doesn't keep up and it doesn't block the decoder thread.
>
> Further work done:
>
> * I added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 5 locks.
>
> * I removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.
>
> * I changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).
>
> * The non-smoothing IncomingVideoStream implementation currently allows only 1 outstanding pending frame.  If we exceed that, the current frame won't be delivered to the renderer and instead we deliver the next one (since when this happens, the renderer is falling behind).
>
> * The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.
>
> * Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)
>
> * Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.
>
> * Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.
>
> * Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/1c7eef652b0aa22d8ebb0bfe2b547094a794be22
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13129}

TBR=mflodman@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2061363002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13146}
2016-06-14 23:04:48 +00:00
tommi
1c7eef652b Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
This CL fixes an issue with the non-smoothing implementation where frames were delivered on the decoder thread.  No-smoothing is now done in a separate class that uses a TaskQueue.  The implementation may drop frames if the renderer doesn't keep up and it doesn't block the decoder thread.

Further work done:

* I added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 5 locks.

* I removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.

* I changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).

* The non-smoothing IncomingVideoStream implementation currently allows only 1 outstanding pending frame.  If we exceed that, the current frame won't be delivered to the renderer and instead we deliver the next one (since when this happens, the renderer is falling behind).

* The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.

* Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)

* Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.

* Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.

* Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.

BUG=

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2035173002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13129}
2016-06-14 11:38:43 +00:00
nisse
e5e5292adb Let VideoRenderFrames::FrameToRender return a rtc::Optional.
This eliminates one use of IsZeroSize.

BUG=webrtc:5682

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2008513003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12891}
2016-05-25 13:25:26 +00:00
Miguel Casas-Sanchez
4765070b8d Rename I420VideoFrame to VideoFrame.
This is a mechanical change since it affects so many
files.
I420VideoFrame -> VideoFrame
and reformatted.

Rationale: in the next CL I420VideoFrame will
get an indication of Pixel Format (I420 for
starters) and of storage type: usually
UNOWNED, could be SHMEM, and in the near
future will be possibly TEXTURE. See
https://codereview.chromium.org/1154153003
for the change that happened in Cr.

BUG=4730, chromium:440843
R=jiayl@webrtc.org, niklas.enbom@webrtc.org, pthatcher@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/52629004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9339}
2015-05-30 00:21:56 +00:00
Peter Boström
9a63866272 Move IncomingVideoFrames to common_video/.
Permits using IncomingVideoFrame in VideoReceiveStream without depending
on VideoRender.

BUG=4588
R=mflodman@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/49199004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9184}
2015-05-13 11:28:04 +00:00