28 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Peter Boström
02bafc6379 Add a race-checking mechanism.
Permits CHECKing/DCHECKing that methods are being accessed in a
thread-safe manner, even if they are not used by one single thread
(thread pools such as VideoToolbox OK).

BUG=
R=danilchap@webrtc.org, tommi@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2097403002 .

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13358}
2016-07-01 10:45:29 +00:00
Taylor Brandstetter
65f47275cb Fixing race condition in IncomingVideoStream.
This really only happens on the memcheck bot. But the issue is that
the render thread may be started before the timer is started on
the main thread, which incorrectly attaches the timer to the render
thread. Then a thread check assertion occurs when the timer is
stopped on the main thread.

Simply starting the timer before starting the render thread fixes this.

BUG=webrtc:6062
TBR=tommi@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2105013002 .

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13317}
2016-06-28 17:46:44 +00:00
Tommi
7893e9a267 Remove a thread checker for a decoder thread from IncomingVideoStream.
The specific decoder thread may vary when using VideoToolbox.

BUG=webrtc:6051
TBR=pbos@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2100083002 .

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13292}
2016-06-27 07:54:58 +00:00
tommi
2e82f3821f Reland of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2084873002/ )
Reason for revert:
Reverting the revert.  This change is not related to the failure on the Windows FYI bots.  The cause of the failure has been reverted in Chromium:
https://codereview.chromium.org/2081653004/

Original issue's description:
> Revert of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without. (patchset #5 id:340001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2078873002/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Breaks chromium.webrtc.fyi
>
> https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.webrtc.fyi/builders/Win7%20Tester/builds/4719
> https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.webrtc.fyi/builders/Win10%20Tester/builds/3120
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Reland of IncomingVideoStream refactoring.
> > This reland does not contain the non-smoothing part of the original implementation.  Instead, when smoothing is turned off, frame callbacks run on the decoder thread, as they did before.  This code path is used in Chrome.  As far as Chrome goes, the difference now is that there won't be an instance of IncomingVideoStream in between the decoder and the callback (i.e. fewer locks).  Other than that, no change for Chrome.
> >
> > Original issue's description (with non-smoothing references removed):
> >
> > Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
> >
> > * Added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 6 locks.
> >
> > * Removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.
> >
> > * Changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).
> >
> > * The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.
> >
> > * Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)
> >
> > * Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.
> >
> > * Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.
> >
> > * Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.
> >
> > BUG=chromium:620232
> > R=mflodman@webrtc.org, nisse@webrtc.org
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/884c336c345d988974c2a69cea402b0fb8b07a63
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13219}
>
> TBR=nisse@webrtc.org,philipel@webrtc.org,mflodman@webrtc.org,tommi@webrtc.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=chromium:620232
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/a536bfe70de38fe877245317a7f0b00bcf69cbd0
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13229}

TBR=nisse@webrtc.org,philipel@webrtc.org,mflodman@webrtc.org,sakal@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:620232

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2089613002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13230}
2016-06-21 07:26:48 +00:00
sakal
a536bfe70d Revert of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without. (patchset #5 id:340001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2078873002/ )
Reason for revert:
Breaks chromium.webrtc.fyi

https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.webrtc.fyi/builders/Win7%20Tester/builds/4719
https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.webrtc.fyi/builders/Win10%20Tester/builds/3120

Original issue's description:
> Reland of IncomingVideoStream refactoring.
> This reland does not contain the non-smoothing part of the original implementation.  Instead, when smoothing is turned off, frame callbacks run on the decoder thread, as they did before.  This code path is used in Chrome.  As far as Chrome goes, the difference now is that there won't be an instance of IncomingVideoStream in between the decoder and the callback (i.e. fewer locks).  Other than that, no change for Chrome.
>
> Original issue's description (with non-smoothing references removed):
>
> Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
>
> * Added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 6 locks.
>
> * Removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.
>
> * Changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).
>
> * The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.
>
> * Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)
>
> * Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.
>
> * Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.
>
> * Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.
>
> BUG=chromium:620232
> R=mflodman@webrtc.org, nisse@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/884c336c345d988974c2a69cea402b0fb8b07a63
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13219}

TBR=nisse@webrtc.org,philipel@webrtc.org,mflodman@webrtc.org,tommi@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:620232

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2084873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13229}
2016-06-21 07:08:58 +00:00
Tommi
884c336c34 Reland of IncomingVideoStream refactoring.
This reland does not contain the non-smoothing part of the original implementation.  Instead, when smoothing is turned off, frame callbacks run on the decoder thread, as they did before.  This code path is used in Chrome.  As far as Chrome goes, the difference now is that there won't be an instance of IncomingVideoStream in between the decoder and the callback (i.e. fewer locks).  Other than that, no change for Chrome.

Original issue's description (with non-smoothing references removed):

Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.

* Added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 6 locks.

* Removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.

* Changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).

* The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.

* Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)

* Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.

* Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.

* Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.

BUG=chromium:620232
R=mflodman@webrtc.org, nisse@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2078873002 .

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13219}
2016-06-20 17:43:10 +00:00
tommi
8e8222d0d2 Revert of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without. (patchset #4 id:290001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2071473002/ )
Reason for revert:
Reverting again.  The perf regression does not seem to be related to dropping frames.

Original issue's description:
> Reland of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
>
> Original issue's description:
>
> Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
>
> This CL fixes an issue with the non-smoothing implementation where frames were delivered on the decoder thread.  No-smoothing is now done in a separate class that uses a TaskQueue.  The implementation may drop frames if the renderer doesn't keep up and it doesn't block the decoder thread.
>
> Further work done:
>
> * I added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 5 locks.
>
> * I removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.
>
> * I changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).
>
> * The non-smoothing IncomingVideoStream implementation currently allows only 1 outstanding pending frame.  If we exceed that, the current frame won't be delivered to the renderer and instead we deliver the next one (since when this happens, the renderer is falling behind).
>
> * The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.
>
> * Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)
>
> * Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.
>
> * Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.
>
> * Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.
>
> BUG=chromium:620232
> TBR=mflodman
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/e03f8787377bbc03a4e00184bb14b7561b108cbb
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13175}

TBR=mflodman@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:620232

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2071093002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13176}
2016-06-16 22:44:11 +00:00
tommi
e03f878737 Reland of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
Original issue's description:

Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.

This CL fixes an issue with the non-smoothing implementation where frames were delivered on the decoder thread.  No-smoothing is now done in a separate class that uses a TaskQueue.  The implementation may drop frames if the renderer doesn't keep up and it doesn't block the decoder thread.

Further work done:

* I added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 5 locks.

* I removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.

* I changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).

* The non-smoothing IncomingVideoStream implementation currently allows only 1 outstanding pending frame.  If we exceed that, the current frame won't be delivered to the renderer and instead we deliver the next one (since when this happens, the renderer is falling behind).

* The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.

* Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)

* Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.

* Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.

* Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.

BUG=chromium:620232
TBR=mflodman

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2071473002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13175}
2016-06-16 20:29:12 +00:00
tommi
17c3cddf9d Revert of Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without. (patchset #23 id:430001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2035173002/ )
Reason for revert:
Reverting while we track down the issue on the Win10 bot.

Original issue's description:
> Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
>
> This CL fixes an issue with the non-smoothing implementation where frames were delivered on the decoder thread.  No-smoothing is now done in a separate class that uses a TaskQueue.  The implementation may drop frames if the renderer doesn't keep up and it doesn't block the decoder thread.
>
> Further work done:
>
> * I added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 5 locks.
>
> * I removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.
>
> * I changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).
>
> * The non-smoothing IncomingVideoStream implementation currently allows only 1 outstanding pending frame.  If we exceed that, the current frame won't be delivered to the renderer and instead we deliver the next one (since when this happens, the renderer is falling behind).
>
> * The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.
>
> * Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)
>
> * Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.
>
> * Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.
>
> * Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/1c7eef652b0aa22d8ebb0bfe2b547094a794be22
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13129}

TBR=mflodman@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2061363002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13146}
2016-06-14 23:04:48 +00:00
tommi
1c7eef652b Split IncomingVideoStream into two implementations, with smoothing and without.
This CL fixes an issue with the non-smoothing implementation where frames were delivered on the decoder thread.  No-smoothing is now done in a separate class that uses a TaskQueue.  The implementation may drop frames if the renderer doesn't keep up and it doesn't block the decoder thread.

Further work done:

* I added TODOs and documentation for VideoReceiveStream::OnFrame, where we today grab 5 locks.

* I removed the Start/Stop methods from the IncomingVideoStream implementations.  Now, when an instance is created, it should be considered to be "running" and when it is deleted, it's "not running".  This saves on resources and also reduces the amount of locking required and I could remove one critical section altogether.

* I changed the VideoStreamDecoder class to not depend on IncomingVideoStream but rather use the generic rtc::VideoSinkInterface<VideoFrame> interface.  This means that any implementation of that interface can be used and the decoder can be made to  just use the 'renderer' from the config.  Once we do that, we can decouple the IncomingVideoStream implementations from the decoder and VideoReceiveStream implementations and leave it up to the application for how to do smoothing.  The app can choose to use the Incoming* classes or roll its own (which may be preferable since applications often have their own scheduling mechanisms).

* The non-smoothing IncomingVideoStream implementation currently allows only 1 outstanding pending frame.  If we exceed that, the current frame won't be delivered to the renderer and instead we deliver the next one (since when this happens, the renderer is falling behind).

* The lifetime of the VideoStreamDecoder instance is now bound to Start/Stop in VideoReceiveStream and not all of the lifetime of VideoReceiveStream.

* Fixed VideoStreamDecoder to unregister callbacks in the dtor that were registered in the ctor. (this was open to a use-after-free regression)

* Delay and callback pointers are now passed via the ctors to the IncomingVideoStream classes.  The thread primitives in the IncomingVideoStream classes are also constructed/destructed at the same time as the owning object, which allowed me to remove one more lock.

* Removed code in the VideoStreamDecoder that could overwrite the VideoReceiveStream render delay with a fixed value of 10ms on construction.  This wasn't a problem with the previous implementation (it would be now though) but seemed to me like the wrong place to be setting that value.

* Made the render delay value in VideoRenderFrames, const.

BUG=

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2035173002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13129}
2016-06-14 11:38:43 +00:00
tommi
ba986bfbaf Remove dead code in IncomingVideoStream that's just causing contention.
BUG=

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2040763002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13053}
2016-06-06 19:21:21 +00:00
mflodman
5724b7317e Remove unused render callback method+pointer in IncomingVideoStream.
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2032003002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13009}
2016-06-02 09:39:12 +00:00
nisse
e5e5292adb Let VideoRenderFrames::FrameToRender return a rtc::Optional.
This eliminates one use of IsZeroSize.

BUG=webrtc:5682

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2008513003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12891}
2016-05-25 13:25:26 +00:00
Niels Möller
d28db7fd65 Delete all use of tick_util.h.
Depends on Chrome cl https://codereview.chromium.org/1888003002/, which was landed some time ago.

BUG=webrtc:5740
R=stefan@webrtc.org, tommi@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1888593004 .

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12674}
2016-05-10 14:31:58 +00:00
nisse
30f118effd This cl deletes the class webrtc::VideoRendererCallback.
Replaced by VideoSinkInterface instead.

Also delete stream_id property of IncomingVideoStream.

BUG=webrtc:5426

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1813173002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12602}
2016-05-03 08:09:17 +00:00
nisse
cc23b7c1ea Delete unused methods SetStartImage and SetTimeoutImage.
Declared in webrtc::VideoRender, implemented in IncomingVideoStream.
This cl also eliminates some of the few uses of
webrtc::VideoFrame::CopyFrame.

BUG=webrtc:5682

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1885323002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12427}
2016-04-19 13:19:47 +00:00
nisse
7ade7b3282 Delete class webrtc::VideoRenderer and its header file.
To replace the SmoothsRenderedFrames method, added a corresponding
flag to VideoReceiveStream::Config instead.

BUG=webrtc:5426

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1818023002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12102}
2016-03-23 11:48:17 +00:00
Niels Möller
739fcb989d Cleanup of webrtc::VideoFrame.
Delete EqualsFrame method, used only by tests. Delete one of the
CreateFrame methods. Drop return value for CreateEmptyFrame, CreateFrame
and CopyFrame.

BUG=webrtc:5426

Committed: https://crrev.com/208019637bfed975f8f13b16d40b90e200763cd6
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11783}

R=mflodman@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org, perkj@webrtc.org, pthatcher@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1679323002 .

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11811}
2016-02-29 12:11:57 +00:00
kjellander
54ebfca934 Revert of Cleanup of webrtc::VideoFrame. (patchset #6 id:100001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/1679323002/ )
Reason for revert:
Breaks downstream compilation. Please make non-breaking API changes for the reland or coordinate fixing downstream code quickly with the sheriff.

Original issue's description:
> Cleanup of webrtc::VideoFrame.
>
> Delete EqualsFrame method, used only by tests. Delete one of the
> CreateFrame methods. Drop return value for CreateEmptyFrame, CreateFrame
> and CopyFrame.
>
> BUG=webrtc:5426
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/208019637bfed975f8f13b16d40b90e200763cd6
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11783}

TBR=pbos@webrtc.org,perkj@webrtc.org,pthatcher@webrtc.org,mflodman@webrtc.org,marpan@webrtc.org,nisse@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=webrtc:5426

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1743613002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11789}
2016-02-26 15:38:57 +00:00
nisse
208019637b Cleanup of webrtc::VideoFrame.
Delete EqualsFrame method, used only by tests. Delete one of the
CreateFrame methods. Drop return value for CreateEmptyFrame, CreateFrame
and CopyFrame.

BUG=webrtc:5426

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1679323002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11783}
2016-02-26 14:40:47 +00:00
tommi
84df580d52 Switch to rtc::CriticalSection in IncomingVideoStream and remove one lock.
BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1608743005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11318}
2016-01-20 12:38:00 +00:00
Peter Boström
8c38e8b9b9 Clean up PlatformThread.
* Move PlatformThread to rtc::.
* Remove ::CreateThread factory method.
* Make non-scoped_ptr from a lot of invocations.
* Make Start/Stop void.
* Remove rtc::Thread priorities, which were unused and would collide.
* Add ::IsRunning() to PlatformThread.

BUG=
R=tommi@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1476453002 .

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10812}
2015-11-26 16:45:57 +00:00
qiangchen
444682acf9 Remove frame time scheduing in IncomingVideoStream
This is part of the project that makes RTC rendering more
smooth. We've already finished the developement of the
frame selection algorithm in WebMediaPlayerMS, where we
managed a frame pool, and based on the vsync interval, we
actively select the best frame to render in order to
maximize the rendering smoothness.

Thus the frame timeline control in IncomingVideoStream is
no longer needed, because with sophisticated frame
selection algorithm in WebMediaPlayerMS, the time control
in IncomingVideoStream will do nothing but add some extra
delay.

BUG=514873

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1419673014

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10781}
2015-11-25 02:08:03 +00:00
pbos
12411ef40e Move ThreadWrapper to ProcessThread in base.
Also removes all virtual methods. Permits using a thread from
rtc_base_approved (namely event tracing).

BUG=webrtc:5158
R=tommi@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1469013002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10760}
2015-11-23 22:48:01 +00:00
kjellander
6f8ce060a2 common_video: rename interface -> include
To avoid breaking downstream, the "interface" directories were copied
into a new "common_video/include" dir. The old headers got pragma
warnings added about deprecation (a very short deprecation since I plan
to remove them as soon downstream is updated).
The header guards are also identical to avoid mixing them up in the transition.

BUG=webrtc:5095
TESTED=Passing compile-trybots with --clobber flag:
git cl try --clobber --bot=win_compile_rel --bot=linux_compile_rel --bot=android_compile_rel --bot=mac_compile_rel --bot=ios_rel --bot=linux_gn_rel --bot=win_x64_gn_rel --bot=mac_x64_gn_rel --bot=android_gn_rel -m tryserver.webrtc

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1418913006

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10659}
2015-11-16 21:52:31 +00:00
Henrik Kjellander
98f53510b2 system_wrappers: rename interface -> include
BUG=webrtc:5095
R=tommi@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1413333002 .

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10438}
2015-10-28 17:17:50 +00:00
Miguel Casas-Sanchez
4765070b8d Rename I420VideoFrame to VideoFrame.
This is a mechanical change since it affects so many
files.
I420VideoFrame -> VideoFrame
and reformatted.

Rationale: in the next CL I420VideoFrame will
get an indication of Pixel Format (I420 for
starters) and of storage type: usually
UNOWNED, could be SHMEM, and in the near
future will be possibly TEXTURE. See
https://codereview.chromium.org/1154153003
for the change that happened in Cr.

BUG=4730, chromium:440843
R=jiayl@webrtc.org, niklas.enbom@webrtc.org, pthatcher@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/52629004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9339}
2015-05-30 00:21:56 +00:00
Peter Boström
9a63866272 Move IncomingVideoFrames to common_video/.
Permits using IncomingVideoFrame in VideoReceiveStream without depending
on VideoRender.

BUG=4588
R=mflodman@webrtc.org

Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/49199004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9184}
2015-05-13 11:28:04 +00:00