Bug: chromium:1018077
Change-Id: I585d4064f39e5f9d268b408ebf6ae13a056c778a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/158403
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29628}
The existing ICE stack will choose *the first* connection
that becomes writable.
It is possible that waiting a fixed time will choose a
better connection, avoiding a switch, and making the experience better
in total.
This patch is add two field trials to *explore*
that dimension. I.e the code will be rolled back once
experiments has been performed.
- initial_select_dampening, delays selection by X ms.
- initial_select_dampening_ping_received, delays selection for
candidate that has received ping by X ms.
BUG=webrtc:11054
Change-Id: Ifcdde5183f318815e0f5db5802fbf6b542a95f5b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/158410
Reviewed-by: Honghai Zhang <honghaiz@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Jonas Oreland <jonaso@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29623}
To avoid IP leak from the CreatePermission request, local relay
candidates must not be paired with remote mDNS candidates, per Section
3.3.2 in draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates-04.
Bug: webrtc:11038
Change-Id: I13aada79c812712b850293c7e17094dc8f77105a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/157340
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Honghai Zhang <honghaiz@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Drake <alexdrake@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29546}
This patch adds field trials for limiting no of STUN pings
- max_outstanding_pings
send this count of outstanding pings (pings w/o any response),
after that never send any before a reply is received.
NOTE:
1) This patch redoes https://webrtc.googlesource.com/src.git/+/0d28972d8f0659ab90cef7fd59ca54fb122b71bc
which was put into the StunRequestManager.
But that mechanism is not used for STUN pings.
2) This patch build on field-trial-parser added in https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/156083
Bug: webrtc:10282
Change-Id: If2f22d2b61a28598a3aa93781c9857145576b7a1
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/156162
Commit-Queue: Jonas Oreland <jonaso@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Honghai Zhang <honghaiz@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29467}
This patch adds a feature enabled using webrtc field trial
that remove connections between RELAY and non-RELAY candidates.
Bug: webrtc:11021
Change-Id: I924076277a843bffc1d25f6de14d2165f7012c4c
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/156083
Reviewed-by: Honghai Zhang <honghaiz@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Jonas Oreland <jonaso@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29464}
There were two different codepaths that could trigger identical LOGs.
b/136184428
Bug: None
Change-Id: I3297c4e957177c3ffdd4c120cfa1b17d250f0a47
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/155582
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29381}
Bug: None
Change-Id: I0e7e76ec2d61a1e2719975701a32c1cfc04f97d5
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/151960
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Drake <alexdrake@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29103}
I gave up on removing proxy_info, user_agent and tcp_options. I don't
think it's feasible to remove them without removing all the proxy code.
The assumption that you can set the proxy and user agent long after
you have created the factory is entrenched in unit tests and the code
itself. So is the ability to set tcp opts depending on protocol or
endpoint properties.
It may be easier to untangle proxy stuff from the factory later,
when it becomes a more first-class citizen and isn't passed via
the allocator.
Requires https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1778870
to land first.
Bug: webrtc:7447
Change-Id: Ib496e2bb689ea415e9f8ec1dfedff13a83fa4a8a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/150799
Commit-Queue: Patrik Höglund <phoglund@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29091}
This is part of a larger refactoring:
1) Add new method and provide default implementations for the other
Create* methods (this CL) so they can be removed downstream.
2) Implement new method in Chromium and remove the overrides of the
other Create* methods from subclasses of PacketSocketFactory.
3) Remove other Create* methods from PacketSocketFactory and make
the new Create method pure virtual. Make BasicPacketSocketFactory
take user_agent and proxy_info in the constructor.
4) Move the slimmed-down packet_socket_factory into api/.
Bug: webrtc:7447
Change-Id: I961fcc4451c9fb2bc7a049b8f57d5894209fd262
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/150941
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Patrik Höglund <phoglund@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29026}
This patch adds accounting and reporting needed for
newly added RTCTransportStats.selectedCandidatePairChanges,
https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-stats/#dom-rtctransportstats-selectedcandidatepairchanges
a) P2PTransportChannel counts everytime selected_connection_
is modified and reports this counter in the GetStats()-call.
b) RTCStatsCollector puts the counter into the standardized
stats object.
Bug: webrtc:10900
Change-Id: Ibaeca18706b8edcbcb44b0c6f2754854bcb545ba
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/149830
Reviewed-by: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Jonas Oreland <jonaso@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28987}
This patch adds a new (optional) attribute to TURN_ALLOCATE_REQUEST,
TURN_LOGGING_ID (0xFF05).
The attribute is put into the comprehension-optional range
so that a TURN server should ignore it if it doesn't know if.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5389#section-18.2
The intended usage of this attribute is to correlate client and
backend logs.
Bug: webrtc:10897
Change-Id: I51fdbe15f9025e817cd91ee8e2c3355133212daa
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/149829
Reviewed-by: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Jonas Oreland <jonaso@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28966}
Per the latest WebRTC stats spec
(https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-stats/#dom-rtcicecandidatestats)
the address field of a peer-reflexive remote candidate should be concealed
until the same address is learnt via addIceCandidate.
This CL also refactors the sanitization-related code paths.
Bug: chromium:968161
Change-Id: I74c5da78232b2f604689867bda2937b8af827c4f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/149381
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28909}
The public API to obtain the selected candidate pair is changed to
GetSelectedCandidatePair in the ICE transport, and the returned pair
has address-sanitized candidates.
Bug: chromium:993878
Change-Id: I44f9d2385a84f9e22447108be2e57ef9e62671eb
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/149080
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28869}
In order to be able to detect and measure context around candidate pair changes.
Bug: webrtc:10419
Change-Id: Iab0d7e7c80d925d1aa44617fc35975fdc6bbc6b9
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/147340
Commit-Queue: Alex Drake <alexdrake@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28779}
Datagram_dtls_adaptor needs access to rtp_rtcp modules and this moves helps to keep p2p/base/ without dependency on rtp_rtcp.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ic337be3fb9f68106187a84efa815eefbe5b0fcd7
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/145267
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28533}
outgoing checks.
This change adds an experimental feature to allow an ICE agent to embed
the transaction ID of the latest connectivity check received from the
remote peer, as an auxiliary acknowledgement in additional to the check
response, in its own checks. This could facilitate the establishment of
ICE connectivity if the check process has a high RTT.
Bug: None
Change-Id: If3e6327720f13beeb14f103af3b5ffb4f9692998
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/142682
Reviewed-by: Honghai Zhang <honghaiz@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28316}
In short, the caller places a x-opaque line in SDP for each m= section that
uses datagram transport. If the answerer supports datagram transport, it will
parse this line and create a datagram transport. It will then echo the x-opaque
line into the answer (to indicate that it accepted use of datagram transport).
If the offer and answer contain exactly the same x-opaque line, both peers will
use datagram transport. If the x-opaque line is omitted from the answer (or is
different in the answer) they will fall back to RTP.
Note that a different x-opaque line in the answer means the answerer did not
understand something in the negotiation proto. Since WebRTC cannot know what
was misunderstood, or whether it's still possible to use the datagram transport,
it must fall back to RTP. This may change in the future, possibly by passing
the answer to the datagram transport, but it's good enough for now.
Negotiation consists of four parts:
1. DatagramTransport exposes transport parameters for both client and server
perspectives. The client just echoes what it received from the server (modulo
any fields it might not have understood).
2. SDP adds a x-opaque line for opaque transport parameters. Identical to
x-mt, but this is specific to datagram transport and goes in each m= section,
and appears in the answer as well as the offer.
- This is propagated to Jsep as part of the TransportDescription.
- SDP files: transport_description.h,cc, transport_description_factory.h,cc,
media_session.cc, webrtc_sdp.cc
3. JsepTransport/Controller:
- Exposes opaque parameters for each mid (m= section). On offerer, this means
pre-allocating a datagram transport and getting its parameters. On the
answerer, this means echoing the offerer's parameters.
- Uses a composite RTP transport to receive from either default RTP or
datagram transport until both offer and answer arrive.
- If a provisional answer arrives, sets the composite to send on the
provisionally selected transport.
- Once both offer and answer are set, deletes the unneeded transports and
keeps whichever transport is selected.
4. PeerConnection pulls transport parameters out of Jsep and adds them to SDP.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ifcc428c8d76fb77dcc8abaa79507c620bcfb31b9
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140920
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28198}
This reverts commit 71c6482baf0ff17141c635e6a7639493db68a65c.
Reason for revert: Lands too much at once and breaks downstream tests that need to implement new interfaces first.
Original change's description:
> Implement true negotiation for DatagramTransport with fallback to RTP.
>
> In short, the caller places a x-opaque line in SDP for each m= section that
> uses datagram transport. If the answerer supports datagram transport, it will
> parse this line and create a datagram transport. It will then echo the x-opaque
> line into the answer (to indicate that it accepted use of datagram transport).
>
> If the offer and answer contain exactly the same x-opaque line, both peers will
> use datagram transport. If the x-opaque line is omitted from the answer (or is
> different in the answer) they will fall back to RTP.
>
> Note that a different x-opaque line in the answer means the answerer did not
> understand something in the negotiation proto. Since WebRTC cannot know what
> was misunderstood, or whether it's still possible to use the datagram transport,
> it must fall back to RTP. This may change in the future, possibly by passing
> the answer to the datagram transport, but it's good enough for now.
>
> Negotiation consists of four parts:
> 1. DatagramTransport exposes transport parameters for both client and server
> perspectives. The client just echoes what it received from the server (modulo
> any fields it might not have understood).
>
> 2. SDP adds a x-opaque line for opaque transport parameters. Identical to
> x-mt, but this is specific to datagram transport and goes in each m= section,
> and appears in the answer as well as the offer.
> - This is propagated to Jsep as part of the TransportDescription.
> - SDP files: transport_description.h,cc, transport_description_factory.h,cc,
> media_session.cc, webrtc_sdp.cc
>
> 3. JsepTransport/Controller:
> - Exposes opaque parameters for each mid (m= section). On offerer, this means
> pre-allocating a datagram transport and getting its parameters. On the
> answerer, this means echoing the offerer's parameters.
> - Uses a composite RTP transport to receive from either default RTP or
> datagram transport until both offer and answer arrive.
> - If a provisional answer arrives, sets the composite to send on the
> provisionally selected transport.
> - Once both offer and answer are set, deletes the unneeded transports and
> keeps whichever transport is selected.
>
> 4. PeerConnection pulls transport parameters out of Jsep and adds them to SDP.
>
> Bug: webrtc:9719
> Change-Id: Id8996eb1871e79d93b7923a5d7eb3431548c798d
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140700
> Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28182}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,mellem@webrtc.org,sukhanov@webrtc.org
Change-Id: I0d502c4a6d27516c35ed85154f3fa5869f88b3b7
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:9719
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140822
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28188}
In short, the caller places a x-opaque line in SDP for each m= section that
uses datagram transport. If the answerer supports datagram transport, it will
parse this line and create a datagram transport. It will then echo the x-opaque
line into the answer (to indicate that it accepted use of datagram transport).
If the offer and answer contain exactly the same x-opaque line, both peers will
use datagram transport. If the x-opaque line is omitted from the answer (or is
different in the answer) they will fall back to RTP.
Note that a different x-opaque line in the answer means the answerer did not
understand something in the negotiation proto. Since WebRTC cannot know what
was misunderstood, or whether it's still possible to use the datagram transport,
it must fall back to RTP. This may change in the future, possibly by passing
the answer to the datagram transport, but it's good enough for now.
Negotiation consists of four parts:
1. DatagramTransport exposes transport parameters for both client and server
perspectives. The client just echoes what it received from the server (modulo
any fields it might not have understood).
2. SDP adds a x-opaque line for opaque transport parameters. Identical to
x-mt, but this is specific to datagram transport and goes in each m= section,
and appears in the answer as well as the offer.
- This is propagated to Jsep as part of the TransportDescription.
- SDP files: transport_description.h,cc, transport_description_factory.h,cc,
media_session.cc, webrtc_sdp.cc
3. JsepTransport/Controller:
- Exposes opaque parameters for each mid (m= section). On offerer, this means
pre-allocating a datagram transport and getting its parameters. On the
answerer, this means echoing the offerer's parameters.
- Uses a composite RTP transport to receive from either default RTP or
datagram transport until both offer and answer arrive.
- If a provisional answer arrives, sets the composite to send on the
provisionally selected transport.
- Once both offer and answer are set, deletes the unneeded transports and
keeps whichever transport is selected.
4. PeerConnection pulls transport parameters out of Jsep and adds them to SDP.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Id8996eb1871e79d93b7923a5d7eb3431548c798d
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140700
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28182}
This is a reland of 9469c784dbf732472e3b2a60a5fcca0a2f432313
Original change's description:
> Added OnIceCandidateError to API and implementation
>
> Bug: webrtc:3098
> Change-Id: I27ffd015ebf9e8130c1288f7331b0e2fdafb01ef
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/135953
> Commit-Queue: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Amit Hilbuch <amithi@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28173}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org
Bug: webrtc:3098
Change-Id: I77af2065fc1479273f399e2b3d919f98fe8ac23d
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140641
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28179}
Bug: webrtc:3098
Change-Id: I27ffd015ebf9e8130c1288f7331b0e2fdafb01ef
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/135953
Commit-Queue: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Hilbuch <amithi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28173}
- This makes it consistent with ICE and MediaTransport ownership.
- Removes unnecessary datagram_transport() getter in DtlsTransportInternal
As a side effect this fixes bug in JsepTransportController, which moved datagram_transport to Dtls after creating it, then checked if (datagram_transport) to decide which RTP transport to create. As a result of this bug we were creating Sded instead of Unencrypted RTP with datagram transport.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ic5b13a450ce6ac5b2a20d388657e3949aabef079
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/139620
Commit-Queue: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28146}
from a field trial to RTCConfiguration.
The test coverage is also expanded for the underlying feature.
Bug: None
Change-Id: Ic9c1362867e4a956c5453be7a9355083b6a442f5
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/138980
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Glaznev <glaznev@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Kári Helgason <kthelgason@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Hilbuch <amithi@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28143}
It does not make sense for DtlsTransport to own ICE, and this arrangement will
not work when negotiating datagram or DTLS transport. During negotiation, both
a DTLS transport and a datagram transport need to be ready to receive from the
same ICE transport, depending on which protocol is chosen by the answerer. Once
the answerer chooses a protocol, the transport that is not chosen must be
deleted, but ICE must be left intact for use by the remaining transport.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ibab969b574c981e3834ced71f8ff88008cb26a6c
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/139340
Reviewed-by: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28113}
This patch is a NOP and moves
- class Connection
- class ConnectionInfo
- class ProxyConnection
from port.{h/cc} to a new file called connection.{h/cc}
BUG=webrtc:10647
Change-Id: I89322d3421d272657e24a46b28ab6679fcdc9450
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/137509
Commit-Queue: Jonas Oreland <jonaso@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28101}
Connect ICE state changes to datagram transport regardless of bypass mode.
ICE states were connected to datagram transport only in bypass mode. As a result, if we received datagram state change notification before ICE state change notification, the state was not propagated.
TODO: We need fake datagram transport implementation/test so that we could unit test such failures without relying on downstream projects.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I5a180676e0d05f707b2a43d07e8c04fb10985027
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/138982
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28094}
This will be used to multiplex multiple transports during SDP
negotiation. When the offerer watns to support multiple RTP transports,
it will combine them into a singla CompositeRtpTransport.
CompositeRtpTransport can receive from any of the offered transports
while waiting for an answer to arrive.
The choice of which transport is used to send must be driven by the SDP
answer. If a provisional answer arrives, the composite can be set to
send using the chosen transport, while maintaining other transports in
case the peer changes its mind. When the final answer arrives, the
composite will be deleted and replaced with the chosen transport.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ib8cea77ef202f37086723bfa2c71e2aa5995a912
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/138281
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28093}
This gives assurance that we're not calling any function in
cricket::P2PTransportChannel off-thread.
Bug: none
Change-Id: I21d4e496cf5f301ab85abbd53a5abd4f5068ec39
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/138271
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28077}
These are unused except in tests, and just add clutter.
Bug: webrtc:9824
Change-Id: Ica209d09850f5ff9b122ce21306aaf1bbfc7bda4
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/138280
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28064}
- Implement datagram transport adaptor, which wraps datagram transport in DtlsTransportInternal. Datagram adaptor owns both ICE and Datagram Transports.
- Implement setup of datagram transport based on RTCConfiguration flag use_datagram_transport. This is very similar to MediaTransport setup with the exception that we create DTLS datagram adaptor.
- Propagate maximum datagram size to video encoder via MediaTransportConfig.
TODO: Currently this CL can only be tested in downstream projects. Once we add fake datagram transport, we will be able to implement unit tests similar to loopback media transport.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I4fa4a5725598dfee5da4f0f374269a7e289d48ed
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/138100
Commit-Queue: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28047}
The gathering of host candidates with mDNS names is asynchronous and its
completion can happen after a srflx candidate is gathered by the same
underlying socket. We have a broken check in UDPPort::CreateConnection()
that assumes the gathering of host and srflx candidates is sequential.
This CL also does minor refactoring and clean-up.
Bug: chromium:944577
Change-Id: Ic28136a9515081f40b232a22fcbf4209814ed33a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/138043
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Hilbuch <amithi@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28030}
This is a reland of e779847fb6499ac2dc4757de8c625ac377e9d0d4
Original change's description:
> Change SimpleStringBuilder::Append to not use strcpyn and SIZE_UNKNOWN
>
> Also add explicit includes of rtc_base/string_utils.h in files depending on it.
>
> Bug: webrtc:6424
> Change-Id: Id6b53937ab2d185d092a5d8863018fd5f1a88e27
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/135744
> Reviewed-by: Karl Wiberg <kwiberg@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27903}
Tbr: kwiberg@webrtc.org
Bug: webrtc:6424
Change-Id: Ic08d5d7fbc25ff89e4182d7c9cb3b0e8e356339a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/135946
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27957}
