Also apply IWYU to all .cc files in pc/, and correct BUILD file to match.
Note: Some files came out wrong when iwyu was applied. These are not included.
Bug: none
Change-Id: Ib5ea46b8fcc505414d0447cca7218ad3afc2e321
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/252280
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#36064}
Make the jsep_transport.cc code conform to WebRTC code style.
Bug: None
Change-Id: I9142c1e83d4006988e206aeb0bbe52dfffafda60
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/244600
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#35631}
Add implementation of RTC_DCHECK_NOTREACHED equal to the RTC_NOTREACHED.
The new macros will replace the old one when old one's usage will be
removed. The idea of the renaming to provide a clear signal that this
is debug build only macros and will be stripped in the production build.
Bug: webrtc:9065
Change-Id: I4c35d8b03e74a4b3fd1ae75dba2f9c05643101db
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/237802
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#35348}
Removes the ability to accept nonencrypted answers to encrypted offers.
Fixes some logic around bundled sessions and requirement for
transport parameters.
Bug: webrtc:11066
Change-Id: I56d8628d223614918a1e5260fdb8a117c8c02dbd
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/236344
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#35298}
This reverts commit 37ee0f5e594dd772ec6d620b5e5ea8a751b684f0.
Reason for revert: Revert in order to be able to revert https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/225642
Original change's description:
> Use backticks not vertical bars to denote variables in comments for /pc
>
> Bug: webrtc:12338
> Change-Id: I88cf10afa5fc810b95d2a585ab2e895dcc163b63
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/226953
> Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34575}
TBR=hta@webrtc.org,titovartem@webrtc.org,webrtc-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com
Change-Id: I5eddd3a14e1f664bf831e5c294fbc4de5f6a88af
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:12338
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/227082
Reviewed-by: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34577}
This is essentially replacing `new rtc::RefCountedObject` with
`rtc::make_ref_counted` in many files. In a couple of places I
made minor tweaks to make things compile such as adding parenthesis
when they were missing.
Bug: webrtc:12701
Change-Id: I3828dbf3ee0eb0232f3a47067474484ac2f4aed2
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/215973
Reviewed-by: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33852}
Make access to rtcp_transport_ limited to network thread.
Bug: none
Change-Id: Id5c2834f758da595724079596d839e528c92e977
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/205982
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33180}
Most members it used to protect or now either const, or accessed on
network thread only.
Followup to https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/204801.
Bug: webrtc:11567
Change-Id: I1bc80555885a8d8e9f7282d5adf93a093879cc7e
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/205980
Commit-Queue: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33178}
Also delete the CompositeRtpTransport class, since it is never
instantiated.
Locking intentionally left unchanged in this cl, except for removal of
RTC_GUARDED_BY annotations on the now const members.
Bug: None
Change-Id: I99c22ff528ce7a46f71081b98ca83745b8146afc
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/205000
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33165}
Also removing need for lock for ice restart flag, fix call paths and
add information about how JsepTransportController's events could live
fully on the network thread and complexity around signaling thread
should be handled by PeerConnection (more details in webrtc:12427).
Bug: webrtc:12426, webrtc:12427
Change-Id: I9b1fae8acf16d90d9716054fc3c390700877a82a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/205221
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33159}
Mark corresponding webrtc::Mutex as mutable, to allow use in const methods.
Bug: webrtc:11567
Change-Id: Ia8c731a91c719a531799abf24fd30a15b54428af
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/204801
Reviewed-by: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33126}
And delete the always null members data_channel_transport_ and
composite_data_channel_transport_ from the JsepTransport class.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ibfd92b74708d63a75521f6f1d5fbc3830bd67e20
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/179280
Reviewed-by: Taylor <deadbeef@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31727}
This patch fixes a problem in https://webrtc.googlesource.com/src/+/71ff07369837d6575c04ebff7002d07d6e0af25f
that when adding standard compliance validation of ufrag/pwd
accidentally broken ice renomination by introducing a new "constructor".
Bug: chromium:1044521
Change-Id: If1b18b1d728e55db9da385b37162a9cb5e61ac48
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/169549
Commit-Queue: Jonas Oreland <jonaso@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Magnus Flodman <mflodman@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30670}
Currently, datagram transports must report identical transport
parameters in order to negotiate use of the datagram transport. This is
not strictly necessary, they just need parameters that fit some notion
of "compatability" (eg. both ends share some mutually-supported version
of the datagram protocol).
This change allows datagram transports to implement their own notion of
compatible transport parameters, by adding a
SetRemoteTransportParameters method to DatagramTransportInterface which
checks if the remote parameters are compatible with the local endpoint
and returns an error if they are not.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I166c787b468b89d9082d7e3c9995a6ed50a1650a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/167741
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30412}
MediaTransport is deprecated and the code is unused.
No-Try: True
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I5b864c1e74bf04df16c15f51b8fac3d407331dcd
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/160620
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Gustaf Ullberg <gustaf@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Åsa Persson <asapersson@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29923}
Bug: chromium:1018077
Change-Id: I585d4064f39e5f9d268b408ebf6ae13a056c778a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/158403
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29628}
The plugin transport parameters (a=x-opaque: lines) relate to how to create and
set up a plugin transport. When SDP bundle is used, the x-opaque line needs to
be copied into the bundled m= section. This means x-opaque can appear on a
section even if the offerer does not intend to use the transport for the media
described by that section. Consequently, the answerer cannot currently tell
whether the caller is offering an alternate transport for media, data, or both.
This change adds an a=x-alt-protocol: line to SDP. The value following this
line matches the <protocol> part of the x-opaque:<protocol>:<params> line.
However, alt-protocol is not bundled--it only ever applies to the m= section
that contains the line. This allows the offerer to express which m= sections
should actually use an alternate transport, even in the case of bundle.
Note that this is still limited by the available configuration options:
datagram transport can be used for media (audio + video) and/or data. It is
still not possible to use it for audio but not video, or vice versa.
PeerConnection places an alt-protocol line in each media (audio/video) m=
section if it is configured to use a datagram transport for media. It places
an alt-protocol line in each data m= section if it is configured to use a
datagram transport for data channels. PeerConnection leaves alt-protocol in
media (audio/video) m= sections of the answer if it is configured to use a
datagram transport for media, and in data m= sections of the answer if it is
configured to use a datagram transport for data channels.
JsepTransport now negotiates use of the datagram transport independently for
media and data channels. It only uses it for media if the m= sections for
bundled audio/video have an alt-protocol line matching the x-opaque protocol,
and only uses it for data channels if a bundled m= section for data has an
alt-protocol line matching the x-opaque protocol.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I773e4fc10c57d815afcd76a2a74da38dd0c52b3b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/154763
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Seth Hampson <shampson@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29351}
This fixes a DCHECK during teardown in the case when the primary
DataChannelTranspot (eg. DatagramTransport) is successfully negotiated.
DatagramTransport expects the DataSink to be unset before it's deleted.
This was not caught by existing tests because the fallback transport
(SctpDataChannelTransport) does not have the same DCHECK.
Also adds a regression test for the issue, in which SCTP is available
as a fallback but DataChannelTransport is negotiated successfully.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I414d964d3c85d3d01cdb5e34d6b248659a613c39
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/154365
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Seth Hampson <shampson@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29292}
This is a reland of 487f9a17e426fd14bb06b13e861071b3f15d119b
Original change's description:
> Reland "Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface."
>
> Also clears SctpTransport before deleting JsepTransport.
>
> SctpTransport is ref-counted, but the underlying transport is deleted when
> JsepTransport clears the rtp_dtls_transport. This results in crashes when
> usrsctp attempts to send outgoing packets through a dangling pointer to the
> underlying transport.
>
> Clearing SctpTransport before DtlsTransport removes the pointer to the
> underlying transport before it becomes invalid.
>
> This fixes a crash in chromium's web platform tests (see
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1776711).
>
> Original change's description:
> > Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface.
> >
> > This change moves SctpTransport to be owned by JsepTransport, which now
> > holds a DataChannelTransport implementation for SCTP when it is used for
> > data channels.
> >
> > This simplifies negotiation and fallback to SCTP. Negotiation can now
> > use a composite DataChannelTransport, just as negotiation for RTP uses a
> > composite RTP transport.
> >
> > PeerConnection also has one fewer way it needs to manage data channels.
> > It now handles SCTP and datagram- or media-transport-based data channels
> > the same way.
> >
> > There are a few leaky abstractions left. For example, PeerConnection
> > calls Start() on the SctpTransport at a particular point in negotiation,
> > but does not need to call this for other transports. Similarly, PC
> > exposes an interface to the SCTP transport directly to the user; there
> > is no equivalent for other transports.
>
> Bug: webrtc:9719
> Change-Id: I64e94b88afb119fdbf5f22750f88c8a084d53937
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/151981
> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29120}
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I28481a3de64a3506bc57748106383eeba4ef205c
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/152740
Reviewed-by: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Seth Hampson <shampson@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29290}
This reverts commit 487f9a17e426fd14bb06b13e861071b3f15d119b.
Reason for revert: speculative revert
Original change's description:
> Reland "Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface."
>
> Also clears SctpTransport before deleting JsepTransport.
>
> SctpTransport is ref-counted, but the underlying transport is deleted when
> JsepTransport clears the rtp_dtls_transport. This results in crashes when
> usrsctp attempts to send outgoing packets through a dangling pointer to the
> underlying transport.
>
> Clearing SctpTransport before DtlsTransport removes the pointer to the
> underlying transport before it becomes invalid.
>
> This fixes a crash in chromium's web platform tests (see
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1776711).
>
> Original change's description:
> > Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface.
> >
> > This change moves SctpTransport to be owned by JsepTransport, which now
> > holds a DataChannelTransport implementation for SCTP when it is used for
> > data channels.
> >
> > This simplifies negotiation and fallback to SCTP. Negotiation can now
> > use a composite DataChannelTransport, just as negotiation for RTP uses a
> > composite RTP transport.
> >
> > PeerConnection also has one fewer way it needs to manage data channels.
> > It now handles SCTP and datagram- or media-transport-based data channels
> > the same way.
> >
> > There are a few leaky abstractions left. For example, PeerConnection
> > calls Start() on the SctpTransport at a particular point in negotiation,
> > but does not need to call this for other transports. Similarly, PC
> > exposes an interface to the SCTP transport directly to the user; there
> > is no equivalent for other transports.
>
> Bug: webrtc:9719
> Change-Id: I64e94b88afb119fdbf5f22750f88c8a084d53937
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/151981
> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29120}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,mellem@webrtc.org,benwright@webrtc.org
Change-Id: Ibd1a7f30931c114212c90824fec414d276d3f915
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:9719
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/152421
Reviewed-by: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29141}
Also clears SctpTransport before deleting JsepTransport.
SctpTransport is ref-counted, but the underlying transport is deleted when
JsepTransport clears the rtp_dtls_transport. This results in crashes when
usrsctp attempts to send outgoing packets through a dangling pointer to the
underlying transport.
Clearing SctpTransport before DtlsTransport removes the pointer to the
underlying transport before it becomes invalid.
This fixes a crash in chromium's web platform tests (see
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1776711).
Original change's description:
> Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface.
>
> This change moves SctpTransport to be owned by JsepTransport, which now
> holds a DataChannelTransport implementation for SCTP when it is used for
> data channels.
>
> This simplifies negotiation and fallback to SCTP. Negotiation can now
> use a composite DataChannelTransport, just as negotiation for RTP uses a
> composite RTP transport.
>
> PeerConnection also has one fewer way it needs to manage data channels.
> It now handles SCTP and datagram- or media-transport-based data channels
> the same way.
>
> There are a few leaky abstractions left. For example, PeerConnection
> calls Start() on the SctpTransport at a particular point in negotiation,
> but does not need to call this for other transports. Similarly, PC
> exposes an interface to the SCTP transport directly to the user; there
> is no equivalent for other transports.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I64e94b88afb119fdbf5f22750f88c8a084d53937
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/151981
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29120}
Bug: None
Change-Id: I0e7e76ec2d61a1e2719975701a32c1cfc04f97d5
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/151960
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Drake <alexdrake@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29103}
This reverts commit 4c85828ab272d9bd58789bad7b135b6287395f97.
Reason for revert:
Speculatively reverting this because it makes several web platform tests relating to RTCDataChannel flaky, see first failing roll:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1776711
Original change's description:
> Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface.
>
> This change moves SctpTransport to be owned by JsepTransport, which now
> holds a DataChannelTransport implementation for SCTP when it is used for
> data channels.
>
> This simplifies negotiation and fallback to SCTP. Negotiation can now
> use a composite DataChannelTransport, just as negotiation for RTP uses a
> composite RTP transport.
>
> PeerConnection also has one fewer way it needs to manage data channels.
> It now handles SCTP and datagram- or media-transport-based data channels
> the same way.
>
> There are a few leaky abstractions left. For example, PeerConnection
> calls Start() on the SctpTransport at a particular point in negotiation,
> but does not need to call this for other transports. Similarly, PC
> exposes an interface to the SCTP transport directly to the user; there
> is no equivalent for other transports.
>
> Bug: webrtc:9719
> Change-Id: I0d3151c48c1a511368277981fc4cf818a9f8ebb4
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/150341
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29012}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,mellem@webrtc.org,benwright@webrtc.org
Change-Id: I074b9e68f298d20d0cabb4239084b4843e76e910
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:9719
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/150944
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29025}
This change moves SctpTransport to be owned by JsepTransport, which now
holds a DataChannelTransport implementation for SCTP when it is used for
data channels.
This simplifies negotiation and fallback to SCTP. Negotiation can now
use a composite DataChannelTransport, just as negotiation for RTP uses a
composite RTP transport.
PeerConnection also has one fewer way it needs to manage data channels.
It now handles SCTP and datagram- or media-transport-based data channels
the same way.
There are a few leaky abstractions left. For example, PeerConnection
calls Start() on the SctpTransport at a particular point in negotiation,
but does not need to call this for other transports. Similarly, PC
exposes an interface to the SCTP transport directly to the user; there
is no equivalent for other transports.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I0d3151c48c1a511368277981fc4cf818a9f8ebb4
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/150341
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29012}
This was an oversight when integrating datagram-based data channels into
JsepTransportController. If a DatagramTransport exists, but only to be
used for data channels, JsepTransportController will still create an RTP
transport for it and use it for RTP.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I93cdb8bfc03159882a83a9f5097d3ef99fed215f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/150241
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28993}
This patch adds accounting and reporting needed for
newly added RTCTransportStats.selectedCandidatePairChanges,
https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-stats/#dom-rtctransportstats-selectedcandidatepairchanges
a) P2PTransportChannel counts everytime selected_connection_
is modified and reports this counter in the GetStats()-call.
b) RTCStatsCollector puts the counter into the standardized
stats object.
Bug: webrtc:10900
Change-Id: Ibaeca18706b8edcbcb44b0c6f2754854bcb545ba
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/149830
Reviewed-by: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Jonas Oreland <jonaso@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28987}
PeerConnection now has a new setting in RTCConfiguration to enable use of
datagram transport for data channels. There is also a corresponding field
trial, which has both a kill-switch and a way to change the default value.
PeerConnection's interaction with MediaTransport for data channels has been
refactored to work with DataChannelTransportInterface instead.
Adds a DataChannelState and OnStateChanged() to the DataChannelSink
callbacks. This allows PeerConnection to listen to the data channel's
state directly, instead of indirectly by monitoring media transport
state. This is necessary to enable use of non-media-transport (eg.
datagram transport) data channel transports.
For now, PeerConnection watches the state through MediaTransport as well.
This will persist until MediaTransport implements the new callback.
Datagram transport use is negotiated. As such, an offer that requests to use
datagram transport for data channels may be rejected by the answerer. If the
offer includes DTLS, the data channels will be negotiated as SCTP/DTLS data
channels with an extra x-opaque parameter for datagram transport. If the
opaque parameter is rejected (by an answerer without datagram support), the
offerer may fall back to SCTP.
If DTLS is not enabled, there is no viable fallback. In this case, the data
channels are negotiated as media transport data channels. If the receiver does
not understand the x-opaque line, it will reject these data channels, and the
offerer's data channels will be closed.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ic1bf3664c4bcf9d754482df59897f5f72fe68fcc
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/147702
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28932}
DatagramDtlsAdaptor wraps a DatagramTransport in a DtlsTransport. This
is only used by wrapping it again, in an RtpTransport. It is simpler to
just wrap DatagramTransport directly into an RtpTransport.
DatagramTransport is never used as a DtlsTransport, and doesn't support
most of the functionality exposed by the DtlsTransport interface.
However, it supports *all* the functionality of the RtpTransport, making
this a much cleaner fit.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I699e8124ee4cb6c8c187162f9b444ff0431a4902
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/149400
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28921}
In short, the caller places a x-opaque line in SDP for each m= section that
uses datagram transport. If the answerer supports datagram transport, it will
parse this line and create a datagram transport. It will then echo the x-opaque
line into the answer (to indicate that it accepted use of datagram transport).
If the offer and answer contain exactly the same x-opaque line, both peers will
use datagram transport. If the x-opaque line is omitted from the answer (or is
different in the answer) they will fall back to RTP.
Note that a different x-opaque line in the answer means the answerer did not
understand something in the negotiation proto. Since WebRTC cannot know what
was misunderstood, or whether it's still possible to use the datagram transport,
it must fall back to RTP. This may change in the future, possibly by passing
the answer to the datagram transport, but it's good enough for now.
Negotiation consists of four parts:
1. DatagramTransport exposes transport parameters for both client and server
perspectives. The client just echoes what it received from the server (modulo
any fields it might not have understood).
2. SDP adds a x-opaque line for opaque transport parameters. Identical to
x-mt, but this is specific to datagram transport and goes in each m= section,
and appears in the answer as well as the offer.
- This is propagated to Jsep as part of the TransportDescription.
- SDP files: transport_description.h,cc, transport_description_factory.h,cc,
media_session.cc, webrtc_sdp.cc
3. JsepTransport/Controller:
- Exposes opaque parameters for each mid (m= section). On offerer, this means
pre-allocating a datagram transport and getting its parameters. On the
answerer, this means echoing the offerer's parameters.
- Uses a composite RTP transport to receive from either default RTP or
datagram transport until both offer and answer arrive.
- If a provisional answer arrives, sets the composite to send on the
provisionally selected transport.
- Once both offer and answer are set, deletes the unneeded transports and
keeps whichever transport is selected.
4. PeerConnection pulls transport parameters out of Jsep and adds them to SDP.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ifcc428c8d76fb77dcc8abaa79507c620bcfb31b9
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140920
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28198}
This reverts commit 71c6482baf0ff17141c635e6a7639493db68a65c.
Reason for revert: Lands too much at once and breaks downstream tests that need to implement new interfaces first.
Original change's description:
> Implement true negotiation for DatagramTransport with fallback to RTP.
>
> In short, the caller places a x-opaque line in SDP for each m= section that
> uses datagram transport. If the answerer supports datagram transport, it will
> parse this line and create a datagram transport. It will then echo the x-opaque
> line into the answer (to indicate that it accepted use of datagram transport).
>
> If the offer and answer contain exactly the same x-opaque line, both peers will
> use datagram transport. If the x-opaque line is omitted from the answer (or is
> different in the answer) they will fall back to RTP.
>
> Note that a different x-opaque line in the answer means the answerer did not
> understand something in the negotiation proto. Since WebRTC cannot know what
> was misunderstood, or whether it's still possible to use the datagram transport,
> it must fall back to RTP. This may change in the future, possibly by passing
> the answer to the datagram transport, but it's good enough for now.
>
> Negotiation consists of four parts:
> 1. DatagramTransport exposes transport parameters for both client and server
> perspectives. The client just echoes what it received from the server (modulo
> any fields it might not have understood).
>
> 2. SDP adds a x-opaque line for opaque transport parameters. Identical to
> x-mt, but this is specific to datagram transport and goes in each m= section,
> and appears in the answer as well as the offer.
> - This is propagated to Jsep as part of the TransportDescription.
> - SDP files: transport_description.h,cc, transport_description_factory.h,cc,
> media_session.cc, webrtc_sdp.cc
>
> 3. JsepTransport/Controller:
> - Exposes opaque parameters for each mid (m= section). On offerer, this means
> pre-allocating a datagram transport and getting its parameters. On the
> answerer, this means echoing the offerer's parameters.
> - Uses a composite RTP transport to receive from either default RTP or
> datagram transport until both offer and answer arrive.
> - If a provisional answer arrives, sets the composite to send on the
> provisionally selected transport.
> - Once both offer and answer are set, deletes the unneeded transports and
> keeps whichever transport is selected.
>
> 4. PeerConnection pulls transport parameters out of Jsep and adds them to SDP.
>
> Bug: webrtc:9719
> Change-Id: Id8996eb1871e79d93b7923a5d7eb3431548c798d
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140700
> Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28182}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,mellem@webrtc.org,sukhanov@webrtc.org
Change-Id: I0d502c4a6d27516c35ed85154f3fa5869f88b3b7
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:9719
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140822
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28188}
