To make it usable in tests without depending on all of CallTest.
Bug: None
Change-Id: Ie3102ab71bcfe3862dd6c35d3285098e961e54df
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/262807
Reviewed-by: Tomas Gunnarsson <tommi@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#36932}
Replayer isn't triggered in any pre- or post-submit checks
and is built only as a part of fuzzers. Therefore it got out of sync
with the requirement of Call::Config::trials being set.
Bug: chromium:1030755
Change-Id: I467a5fa19137020f6fc748b6adb6f82a8a88f9d1
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/169847
Reviewed-by: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30695}
Static libraries don't guarantee that an exported symbol gets linked
into a shared library (and in order to support Chromium's component
build mode, WebRTC needs to be linked as a shared library).
Source sets always pass all the object files to the linker.
On the flip side, source_sets link more object files in release builds
and to avoid this, this CL introduces a the GN template "rtc_library" that
expands to static_library during release builds and to source_set during
component builds.
See: https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/master/docs/reference.md#func_source_set
Bug: webrtc:9419
Change-Id: I4667e820c2b3fcec417becbd2034acc13e4f04fe
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/157168
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Karl Wiberg <kwiberg@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29525}
Do not fuzz with real renderer because it is merely frame copying and
doesn't exercise different control flows. This CL also improved fuzzing
performance and fixed a memory leak.
Bug: chromium:952606, chromium:1009077, chromium:1009073
Change-Id: I77c6f2581db82bfd95edb18e5f0e541a94c78208
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/156620
Commit-Queue: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29522}
This speed up fuzzing because no more SleepMs in real time.
Bug: chromium:959836, chromium:1009073
Change-Id: Ib00a2ff8d6ca2e0bfc706ee7469e0a9c7fb10758
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/156362
Commit-Queue: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29439}
There are a few reasons for making this test only:
* The code is only used by tests and utilities.
* The pure interface has only a single implementation so an interface isn't really needed.
(a followup change could remove it altogether)
* The implementation always incorporates locking regardless of how the class gets used.
See e.g. previous use in the Packet class.
* The implementation is a layer on top of RtpUtility::RtpHeaderParser which is
sufficient for most production cases.
Change-Id: Ide6d50567cf8ae5127a2eb04cceeb10cf317ec36
Bug: none
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/150658
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Karl Wiberg <kwiberg@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29010}
This change integrates fuzzing support for RtpDumps in WebRTC. This allows
LibFuzzer to directly fuzz the RTP code path from packet arrival all the way
to actual decoding and rendering. It does this by replaying each RTP packet
in the RTPDump which can be mutated directly by the fuzzer.
For fuzzing support the RtpFileReader needs to support reading from a
buffer instead of an file. The test class requires FILE* for all its
parsing operations and is deeply coupled this way. I chose to solve this
problem at an OS level by using the tmpfile() option and copying the buffer
to the tmpfile(). fmemopen() is no available on most platforms so couldn't
be used as a generic solution. The additional copy isn't ideal but won't
be a bottleneck for the fuzzing.
In the future I plan for the fuzzers to read from a configuration file. But
given the current packaging strategy for fuzzers in WebRTC this isn't easy.
Bug: webrtc:9860
Change-Id: I2560120e82663f9e9fb5b9640e6a6d16f9c1a360
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/126682
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27151}
