This will be included in INIT/INIT_ACK if the socket has
configured the "accept zero checksum" parameter, that will
be added in follow-up CLs.
Bug: webrtc:14997
Change-Id: I1a2823fbc77cfea8fe746b07c1c77593bc15efe9
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/298480
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39702}
Adding strong types went a little too far as these two types represent
the same sequence number. A "request sequence number" is a number, that
- when responded to - will be used as "response sequence number".
Having them separate added confusion and just a lot of type-casting.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: I4636ea8f2252023a2d5a9b7033763e1978b1812e
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/214130
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33789}
Quite a large commit, but mostly trivial. It adds all the (in dcSCTP)
supported parameters, error causes and chunks as an object model, with
serializers and deserializers. They are verified with packet captures
where available, that have been captured with Wireshark against a
reference implementation.
This _could_ be split in parameter/ as one commit, error_cause/ in the
following, and chunk/ as the third, but as each chunk/parameter is
completely isolated from the other, reviewing it should be linear with
the number of chunks/parameters and having them in more commits wouldn't
change that, taken all those three commits into account.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: Ie83c9a22cae6e3a39e35ef26fd532837a6387a08
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/213347
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33625}
