From b2a5785e79410da4a9fd2e09b2c768bd15545ed4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mirko Bonadei Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:19:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Don't assume strict order of IPs Bug: None Change-Id: I2005a4472b8a14e03a273f430fc6986f6ec0a4bd Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/256012 Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#36249} --- rtc_base/network_unittest.cc | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtc_base/network_unittest.cc b/rtc_base/network_unittest.cc index e622ca334a..afff0b5923 100644 --- a/rtc_base/network_unittest.cc +++ b/rtc_base/network_unittest.cc @@ -1058,8 +1058,8 @@ TEST_F(NetworkTest, TestMergeNetworkList) { // IPAddresses. EXPECT_EQ(list2.size(), 1uL); EXPECT_EQ(list2[0]->GetIPs().size(), 2uL); - EXPECT_EQ(list2[0]->GetIPs()[0], InterfaceAddress(ip1)); - EXPECT_EQ(list2[0]->GetIPs()[1], InterfaceAddress(ip2)); + EXPECT_THAT(list2[0]->GetIPs(), UnorderedElementsAre(InterfaceAddress(ip1), + InterfaceAddress(ip2))); } // Test that MergeNetworkList successfully detects the change if