From a93d5ac019ede2dcd3022785456c13815e40417c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: stefan <stefan@webrtc.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 02:14:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Don't simulate probing based on rtc event logs since we don't
 have that info logged.

BUG=webrtc:6217

Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2250963002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13792}
---
 webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc b/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc
index c9621f4057..1db7672b9c 100644
--- a/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc
+++ b/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc
@@ -834,7 +834,8 @@ void EventLogAnalyzer::CreateBweSimulationGraph(Plot* plot) {
       if (rtp.header.extension.hasTransportSequenceNumber) {
         RTC_DCHECK(rtp.header.extension.hasTransportSequenceNumber);
         cc.GetTransportFeedbackObserver()->AddPacket(
-            rtp.header.extension.transportSequenceNumber, rtp.total_length, 0);
+            rtp.header.extension.transportSequenceNumber, rtp.total_length,
+            PacketInfo::kNotAProbe);
         rtc::SentPacket sent_packet(
             rtp.header.extension.transportSequenceNumber, rtp.timestamp / 1000);
         cc.OnSentPacket(sent_packet);